ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2018
Recent updates in the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic right hemicolectomy: insights from a single centre.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- The effects of socioeconomic deprivation on colorectal cancer outcomes; a retrospective regional cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Is Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) as safe and effective as laparoscopic TME for low rectal cancer? A propensity score-matched analysis.Surgery today · 2026Article
- The role of the lymphatic network in colorectal cancer: anatomy, molecular drivers and management.Annals of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Nonemergency colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: the National Consultant Information Programme (NCIP) used to highlight colorectal surgery practice and outcomes in England 2018-2022.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Cost analysis of robot NICE procedure versus open, laparoscopic, and robotic colorectal surgery: is there an economic benefit to natural orifice resection?Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer: Therapeutic Approaches and Their Complications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Multifaceted Applications of Nanomaterials in Colorectal Cancer Management: Screening, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Advancing targeted therapy for colorectal cancer: harnessing ligand-directed enzyme prodrug therapy for highly specific interventions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Analysis of the predictive postoperative recurrence performance of three lymph node staging systems in patients with colon cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Localized Drug Delivery in Different Gastrointestinal Cancers: Navigating Challenges and Advancing Nanotechnological Solutions.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the immunological mechanism of Houttuynia cordata in the treatment of colorectal cancer through combined network pharmacology and experimental validation.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: an observational study of medicare advantage and fee-for-service beneficiaries.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Observational
- A pan-cancer dye for solid-tumour screening, resection and wound monitoring via short-wave and near-infrared fluorescence imaging.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Impact of Surgical and Anesthetic Procedures after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study (The PROCOL Study).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Biodegradation of hydroxylated boron nitride nanoplatelets, their toxic effect and drug delivery application.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Trends in patterns of treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients using cancer registry data in Japan: 1995-2015.Cancer science · 2024Article
- NFκB signalling in colorectal cancer: Examining the central dogma of IKKα and IKKβ signalling.Heliyon · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of recent advances in medical technology and new findings of clinical trials, treatment options for colorectal cancer are evolutionally changing, even in the last few years. Therefore, we need to update the treatment options and strategies so that patients can receive optimal and tailored treatment. The present review aimed to elucidate the recent global trends and update the surgical treatment strategies in colorectal cancer by citing the literature published in the last 2 years, namely 2016 and 2017. Although laparoscopic surgery is still considered the most common approach for the treatment of colorectal cancer, new surgical technologies such as transanal total mesorectal excision, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection are emerging. However, with the recent evidence, superiority of the laparoscopic approach to the open approach for rectal cancer seems to be controversial. Surgeons should notice the risk of adverse outcomes associated with unfounded and uncontrolled use of these novel techniques. Many promising results are accumulating in preoperative and postoperative treatment including chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Development of new biomarkers seems to be essential for further improvement in the treatment outcomes of colorectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.