Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29863140›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2017

Postoperative complications after stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: A multicenter study.

Tsuyoshi Konishi, Hideyuki Ishida, Hideki Ueno, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Takao Hinoi, Yasuhiro Inoue, Fumio Ishida, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Naohiro Tomita and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Update on Surgical Management of FAP.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anastomotic Leak after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Tsuyoshi KonishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Gastroenterological Center Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-0785
Hideyuki IshidaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Hideki UenoStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Hirotoshi KobayashiStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Takao HinoiStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Yasuhiro InoueStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Fumio IshidaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Yukihide KanemitsuStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Tatsuro YamaguchiStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Naohiro TomitaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Nagahide MatsubaraStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Toshiaki WatanabeStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Kenichi SugiharaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Tokyo Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPHiroshima University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPMie University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after total proctocolectomy (TPC) can be conducted with either hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Although stapled IPAA without mucosectomy has a higher risk for developing adenomas in the remnant mucosa, it is the simpler procedure with potential benefit in short-term outcomes. However, it remains controversial as to whether stapled IPAA has any advantages in reducing postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to compare the postoperative complications and short-term outcomes of stapled and hand-sewn IPAA for patients with FAP, using a multicenter cohort sample in Japan. Data of 143 patients with FAP who underwent TPC with stapled IPAA (n=37) and hand-sewn IPAA (n=106) at 23 institutions between 2000 and 2012 were collected. Postoperative complications, proportion of ostomy, fecal continence and overall survival were compared. Overall rates of the Clavien-Dindo grade II-IV complications were not different between the two groups (19% in stapled vs 25% in hand-sewn,

Indexed as

familial adenomatous polyposisileal pouch‐anal anastomosistotal proctocolectomy

Identifiers

PMID29863140
PMCPMC5881308
OpenAlexW2738580060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.