ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2017
Comparison of guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: What is the next step beyond the current guidelines?
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidermoid Cysts in an Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen Mimicking Pancreatic Neoplasms: Two Case Reports and a Literature Review of Japanese Cases.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Histological Subtypes Might Help Risk Stratification in Different Morphological Types of IPMNs: Back to the Future?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Recurrence following Resection of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Systematic Review to Guide Surveillance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical trajectory of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms progressing to pancreatic carcinomas during long-term surveillance: a prospective series of 100 carcinoma cases.Journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Role of peroral cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic disease: past, present, and future.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Recurrent pancreatitis due to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a young adult.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Molecular Diagnosis of Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas: a Review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Review
- Nomograms predicting long-term survival in patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: A population-based study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- The diagnosis and management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: has progress been made?Updates in surgery · 2019Review
- Comparison of guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: What is the next step beyond the current guidelines?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm is controversial, and several guidelines have aimed to establish an adequate strategy for surgical resection and surveillance. We compared various intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm guidelines and considered new matters that are pivotal for improved treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. We identified and compared 11 published guidelines, three of which were major guidelines that mainly referred to the diagnosis and treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (International Association of Pancreatology 2012 guidelines, European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas 2013 guidelines, and American Gastroenterological Association 2015 guidelines). The main concerns of these three guidelines were indication for surgery and follow up of non-resected lesions. Among the differences between the three guidelines, the period of surveillance recommended was the most controversial matter. Meanwhile, several nomograms have been proposed to improve the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm from the level of experts' experiences to that of rational systems. We discuss the adequate strategy of surveillance for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with and without pancreatectomy and nomograms aiming to predict the risk of malignancy in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.