Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29862945›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2018

MPT64 patch test for the diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomised controlled trial in Peru.

V Pope, K A Sacksteder, J Coronel Hererra, R H Gilman, S Vargas-Prada, S Lopez Romero, J Yafac, E Sanchez Rios, D A J Moore

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of potential screening biomarkers for active TB disease.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

V PopeTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
K A SackstederSequella, Inc, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
J Coronel HererraUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
R H GilmanUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
S Vargas-PradaCentre for Research in Occupational Health, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Unidad Central de Contingencias Comunes (U3C), Mutua Asepeyo, Barcelona, Spain.
S Lopez RomeroUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
J YafacHospital Huaycan, Lima Este, Peru.
E Sanchez RiosUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
D A J MooreTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEJohns Hopkins University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPompeu Fabra University · ESSequella (United States) · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust 078067/Z/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThere remains a lack of effective and inexpensive diagnostic tools for active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Testing immune responses to proteins secreted by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, such as MPT64, may be a diagnostic option.

objectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a patch test using MPT64 for the diagnosis of active TB disease.

designThis randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study in Lima, Peru, involved 55 healthy controls and 457 symptomatic individuals referred for routine TB testing by the National TB Control Programme. All subjects underwent a comprehensive diagnostic workup, and received an active patch on one arm and a placebo patch on the opposite arm, which were read after 4 days.

resultsEighty-one (18%) of the symptomatic participants were classified as having definite TB, while an additional 98 (21%) had probable TB. The patch tests performed the same in both groups, with a sensitivity of 27% and specificity of 74%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.495 (95%CI 0.425-0.565).

conclusionsContrary to existing literature, the MPT64 patch was not sensitive and specific to detect active TB. Given the potential of the test, understanding possible differences in the protein source or underlying genetic factors should be explored further.

Indexed as

AdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMycobacterium tuberculosisPatch TestsPeruProspective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, PulmonaryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29862945
PMCPMC5947422
OpenAlexW2807097391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.