Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29862943›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease2018

Evidence-informed policy making at country level: lessons learned from the South African Tuberculosis Think Tank.

R G White, S Charalambous, V Cardenas, P Hippner, T Sumner, F Bozzani, D Mudzengi, R M G J Houben, D Collier, M E Kimerling and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Informing Balanced Investment in Services and Health Systems: A Case Study of Priority Setting for Tuberculosis Interventions in South Africa.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving the quality of modelling evidence used for tuberculosis policy evaluation.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

R G WhiteTB Modelling Group, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
S CharalambousAurum Institute, Johannesburg, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Advancing Treatment and Care for TB/HIV, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa.
V CardenasAurum Institute, Washington DC, USA.
P HippnerAurum Institute, Johannesburg.
T SumnerTB Modelling Group, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
F BozzaniTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
D MudzengiAurum Institute, Johannesburg.
R M G J HoubenTB Modelling Group, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
D CollierWhiteOx, Bristol, UK.
M E KimerlingKNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
A VassallTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Y PillaySouth African National TB Control Programme, Pretoria, South Africa.
G ChurchyardTB Modelling Group, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Advancing Treatment and Care for TB/HIV, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAurum Institute · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZATuBerculosis Vaccine Initiative · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J005088/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational Tuberculosis Programmes (NTPs) require specialist input to support the development of policy and practice informed by evidence, typically against tight deadlines.

objectiveTo describe lessons learned from establishing a dedicated tuberculosis (TB) think tank to advise the South African NTP on TB policy. INTERVENTION AND EVALUATION

methodsA national TB think tank was established to advise the NTP in support of evidence-informed policy. Support was provided for activities, including meetings, modelling and regular telephone calls, with a wider network of unpaid expert advisers under an executive committee and working groups. Intervention evaluation used desktop analysis of documentary evidence, interviews and direct observation.

resultsThe TB Think Tank evolved over time to acquire three key roles: an 'institution', a 'policy dialogue forum' and an 'interface'. Although enthusiasm was high, motivating participation among the NTP and external experts proved challenging. Motivation of working groups was most successful when aligned to a specific need for NTP decision making. Despite challenges, the TB Think Tank contributed to South Africa's first ever TB and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) investment case, and the decision to create South Africa's first ever ring-fenced grant for TB. The TB Think Tank also assisted the NTP in formulating strategy to accelerate progress towards reaching World Health Organization targets. DISCUSSION: With partners, the TB Think Tank achieved major successes in supporting evidence-informed decision making, and garnered increased funding for TB in South Africa. Identifying ways to increase the involvement of NTP staff and other experts, and keeping the scope of the Think Tank well defined, could facilitate greater impact. Think tank initiatives could be replicated in other settings to support evidence-informed policy making.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingDecision MakingEvidence-Based MedicineHIV InfectionsHumansNational Health ProgramsSouth AfricaTuberculosisWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID29862943
PMCPMC5947421
OpenAlexW2805059471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.