Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29862937›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019

Feasibility of WHO mhGAP-intervention guide in reducing experienced discrimination in people with mental disorders: a pilot study in a rural Kenyan setting.

V N Mutiso, K Pike, C W Musyimi, T J Rebello, A Tele, I Gitonga, G Thornicroft, D M Ndetei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

V N MutisoAfrica Mental Health Foundation,Nairobi,Kenya.
K PikeGlobal Mental Health Program,Columbia University,New York,USA.
C W MusyimiAfrica Mental Health Foundation,Nairobi,Kenya.
T J RebelloGlobal Mental Health Program,Columbia University,New York,USA.
A TeleAfrica Mental Health Foundation,Nairobi,Kenya.
I GitongaAfrica Mental Health Foundation,Nairobi,Kenya.
G ThornicroftInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London,London,UK.
D M NdeteiAfrica Mental Health Foundation,Nairobi,Kenya.
Africa Mental Health Foundation · KEColumbia University · USKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AimsStigma can have a negative impact on help-seeking behaviour, treatment adherence and recovery of people with mental disorders. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of the WHO Mental Health Treatment Gap Interventions Guidelines (mhGAP-IG) to reduce stigma in face-to-face contacts during interventions for specific DSM-IV/ICD 10 diagnoses over a 6-month period.

methodsThis study was conducted in 20 health facilities across Makueni County in southeast Kenya which has one of the poorest economies in the country and has no psychiatrist or clinical psychologist. We recruited 2305 participants from the health facilities catchment areas that had already been exposed to community mental health services. We measured stigma using DISC-12 at baseline, followed by training to the health professionals on intervention using the WHO mhGAP-IG and then conducted a follow-up DISC-12 assessment after 6 months. Proper management of the patients by the trained professionals would contribute to the reduction of stigma in the patients.

resultsThere was 59.5% follow-up at 6 months. Overall, there was a significant decline in 'reported/experienced discrimination' following the interventions. A multivariate linear mixed model regression indicated that better outcomes of 'unfair treatment' scores were associated with: being married, low education, being young, being self-employed, higher wealth index and being diagnosed with depression. For 'stopping self' domain, better outcomes were associated with being female, married, employed, young, lower wealth index and a depression diagnosis. In regards to 'overcoming stigma' domain; being male, being educated, employed, higher wealth index and being diagnosed with depression was associated with better outcomes.

conclusionsThe statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction of discrimination following the interventions by trained health professionals suggest that the mhGAP-IG may be a useful tool for reduction of discrimination in rural settings in low-income countries.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersDiscrimination, PsychologicalHealthcare DisparitiesPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareSocial StigmaAdultDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMental DisordersMental HealthPilot ProjectsDiscriminationmental healthmental illness stigmaprimary care

Identifiers

PMID29862937
PMCPMC6999029
OpenAlexW2805681265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.