Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29862855›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of dermatological treatment2019

A feasibility study of a novel low-level light therapy for digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis.

M Hughes, T Moore, J Manning, J Wilkinson, S Watson, P Samraj, G Dinsdale, C Roberts, L E Rhodes, A L Herrick and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M Hughesa Centre for Musculoskeletal Research , The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester , UK.
T Mooreb Department of Rheumatology , Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Salford , UK.
J Manningb Department of Rheumatology , Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Salford , UK.
J Wilkinsonc Research and Development , Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Salford , UK.
S Watsond Medical Physics Department and University of Manchester , Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , UK.
P Samraje Medical Physics Department , Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , UK.
G Dinsdalea Centre for Musculoskeletal Research , The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester , UK.
C Robertsf Centre for Biostatistics , Institute of Population Health, School of Medicine, The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
L E Rhodesg Photobiology Unit, Dermatology Centre, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences , The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester , UK.
A L Herricka Centre for Musculoskeletal Research , The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester , UK.
A Murraya Centre for Musculoskeletal Research , The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester , UK.
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 19465Arthritis Research UK 20482Versus Arthritis 20482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocally acting, well-tolerated treatments for systemic sclerosis (SSc) digital ulcers (DUs) are needed.

objectivesOur primary aim was to investigate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of a novel low-level light therapy (LTTT). A secondary aim was to tentatively assess efficacy.

methodsA custom-built device comprising infrared (850 nm), red (660 nm), and violet (405 nm) LEDs was utilized. DUs were irradiated with 10 J/cm

resultsIn all, 14 DUs in eight patients received a total of 46 light exposures, with no safety concerns. All patients considered LTTT 'took just the right amount of time' and was 'feasible', with a low associated mean pain VAS of 1.6 (SD: 5.2). Patient and clinician global DC VAS improved during the study (mean change: -7.1 and -5.2, respectively, both p < .001). DU perfusion significantly increased post-irradiation.

conclusionsLTTT for DUs is safe, feasible, and well tolerated. There was an early tentative suggestion of treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleFingersHumansLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMiddle AgedScleroderma, SystemicSkin UlcerTreatment Outcomedigital ulcersphototherapysclerodermaSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID29862855
PMCPMC6484448
OpenAlexW2805634482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.