ArticlePediatric quality & safety2017
Antidepressant Use by Youth with Minimal or Mild Depression: Evidence from 3 Health Systems.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is concern about the prevalence of prescribing antidepressant medications to youth without appropriate diagnoses or who have subthreshold (mild) depression.
methodsElectronic records data from 3 large healthcare systems identified youth aged ≤21 years starting a new episode of antidepressant treatment between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. For those with a diagnosis of depression, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) scores at the time of treatment initiation were used to examine the distribution of symptom severity and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics.
resultsOf the 15,460 episodes of treatment, a depression diagnosis was recorded in 95% of the cases. PHQ9 scores were available for 4,329 youth with a diagnosis of depression. Younger age, sex, previous treatment, co-occurring anxiety, treatment setting, concurrent psychotherapy, and site were significant predictors of completing a PHQ9. Among youth with a baseline score, 87% reported moderate or severe symptoms (PHQ9 score ≥ 10) and 13% reported mild or minimal symptoms (PHQ9 < 10). The proportion reporting PHQ9 < 10 when starting treatment decreased with age, ranging from 19% in those aged 13-14 years and 12% in those aged 18-21 years. Patients treated by psychiatrists were 1.54 times (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.21-1.97) more likely to have PHQ9 scores < 10 compared with primary care physicians. Patients with prior treatment history (odds ratio = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.45-2.13) and concurrent psychotherapy (odds ratio = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.52) were more likely to have PHQ9 < 10.
conclusionsIn these health systems, prescribing of antidepressant medication to adolescents for minimal or mild depression is much less common than previous reported.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.