ArticleBioMed research international2018
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in a
Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Ultrasound Monitoring for Fracture-Related Infection of the Proximal Femur: A Case Report.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Conventional Dressing in Lower Limb Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Polymer-Based Functional Materials Loaded with Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Potential Scaffolds for the Management of Infected Wounds.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Negative pressure wound therapy promotes wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers by up-regulating PRDX2 in wound margin tissue.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Negative pressure wound therapy with intermittent irrigation for treatment of post-traumatic giant abscess: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022Article
- Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressings.Advances in wound care · 2021Article
- Retained Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Foams as a Cause of Infection Persistence.Advances in wound care · 2021Review
- Pre-Clinical Assessment of Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy DuringAdvances in wound care · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Non-Conventional Antimicrobial Approaches for Chronic Wound Biofilms: Have We Found the 'Chink in the Armor'?Biomedicines · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNegative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an effective strategy for the management of contaminated wounds, including those infected by
methodsWounds were created in anesthetized rabbits and
resultsNPWT was more effective than the control treatment in reducing virulence factors and bacteria counts
conclusionNPWT reduced bacteria counts, virulence factors, and eDNA in a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.