Trial reportBioMed research international2018
The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.
Trial report in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03471000 (The Influence of the Crown-implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability - 36 Months Clinical Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Influence of the Crown-implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability - 36 Months Clinical Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Outcomes of Short versus Long Dental Implants with Sinus Lift in Atrophied Posterior Maxillae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Puerto Rico health sciences journal · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical performance of short implants vs. standard implants in edentulous patients. An umbrella review.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.International journal of implant dentistry · 2021Trial
- Clinical success of single crowns supported by short implants-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Odontology · 2026Review
- Review
- The effect of porous compliance bushings in a dental implant on the distribution of occlusal loads.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- The role of folded fibular flap in patients' reconstruction of mandibular defects: a retrospective clinical study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Peri-Implant Bone Loss Measurement Using a Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network on Dental Periapical Radiographs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Short (6 mm) and Regular Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla-7-Years Follow-up Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Behavior of Short Dental Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Does crown-to-implant ratio affect marginal bone loss around a single short implant at the posterior of the mandible?National journal of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhen the era of dental implantology began, the pioneers defined some gold standards used in dental prosthetics treatment for implant-supported restorations. Referring to traditional prosthetics, it was taken for granted that the length of an implant placed in the alveolar bone (the equivalent of the root) should exceed the length of the superstructure. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to determine whether implant length and the crown-to-implant ( MATERIAL AND
methodsThe patients participating in the study (
resultsPositive results in terms of primary and secondary stability were achieved with both (short and conventional) implants. The MBL was low for short and conventional implants being 0.34 ± 0.24 mm and 0.22 ± 0.46 mm, respectively. No significant correlation was found between the
conclusionsShort implants can be successfully used to support single crowns. The study has revealed no significant differences in the clinical performance of prosthetic restorations supported by short implants. Clinical trial registration number is NCT03471000.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.