Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29862166›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2018

Current approaches and future directions in the management of pterygium.

Kyoung Woo Kim, Jae Chan Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075227 (A Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075227 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized Clinical Trial: Comparison of the Efficacy of Topical 0.2% Loteprednol Etabonate and Topical 0.1% Dexamethasone in Impending Recurrent Pterygium

TypeinterventionalSponsorWannisa SuphachearabhanRan2015 to 2019Enrolled108ConditionsRecurrent Pterygium of Eye, Steroid-Induced GlaucomaArms0.2% loteprednol etabonate, 0.1% dexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular vision · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How to minimize pterygium recurrence rates: clinical perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Recurrent Pterygium: A Review.Journal of current ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyoung Woo KimGraduate School of Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul 156-755, Republic of Korea.
Jae Chan KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul 156-755, Republic of Korea.
Chung-Ang University · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pterygium, a common ocular surface disorder, has a complex pathophysiology that may mimic tumorigenesis. There is altered expression of cell cycle/proliferation-related factors in pterygium tissues. Therefore, similar to cancer treatments, the management of pterygium ought to be multifactorial based on the patient's condition. Current therapeutic methods for pterygium are focused on surgical resection in conjunction with antimetabolite use, in addition tissue graft is usually performed in the context of the avoidance of bare sclera. However, future directions in the management of pterygia will likely focus on genetic approaches. This perspective views the pathogenesis of pterygium, its existing therapies as well as current and future challenges in its treatment.

Indexed as

future directionspterygiumrecurrencetumor

Identifiers

PMID29862166
PMCPMC5957019
OpenAlexW2807175713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.