Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29861827›Full record

ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2018

Diurnal Variation in Physiological and Immune Responses to Endurance Sport in Highly Trained Runners in a Hot and Humid Environment.

B Boukelia, E C Gomes, G D Florida-James

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06601660 (Effect of Combined Physical Training At Different Times of the Day on Muscle and Adipose Tissue Remodeling, Metabolism and Physical Performance in Female Mice and Women with Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06601660 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Combined Physical Training At Different Times of the Day on Muscle and Adipose Tissue Remodeling, Metabolism and Physical Performance in Female Mice and Women with Obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorState University of Minas GeraisRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsObesity Type I and II, Obesity and OverweightArmsMorning Physical Training, Night Physical Training, No intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exercise Timing and Circadian Rhythms.Current opinion in physiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B BoukeliaSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-9846
E C GomesSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
G D Florida-JamesSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the physiological and immunological response of highly trained runners to an intense bout of exercise performed at two different times of day, in a hot, humid environment.

methodsUsing a crossover randomized design, 13 highly trained runners (range [Formula: see text] 64-79 ml·kg

resultsA significant diurnal difference (

conclusionIn hot and humid conditions, athletes may wish to consider, when possible, racing and particularly training in the morning where the least homeostatic perturbation occurs.

Indexed as

AthletesAdultBlood PressureBody TemperatureCircadian RhythmHeart RateHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansHumidityInterleukin-6LeukocytesLungMaleNeutrophilsTemperatureTime FactorsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsInterleukin-6SCGB1A1 protein, humanUteroglobin

Identifiers

PMID29861827
PMCPMC5971328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.