ArticleBiomicrofluidics2018
Deciphering the relative contribution of vascular inflammation and blood rheology in metastatic spreading.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hormonal and Genetic Regulatory Events in Breast Cancer and Its Therapeutics: Importance of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- A data-driven approach to modeling cancer cell mechanics during microcirculatory transport.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Biofabrication Strategies and Engineered In Vitro Systems for Vascular Mechanobiology.Advanced healthcare materials · 2020Review
- Modulating the Distant Spreading of Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Cells via Aspirin and Metformin.Translational oncology · 2020Article
- Preface to Special Topic: Bio-Transport Processes and Drug Delivery in Physiological Micro-Devices.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular adhesion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is a key step in cancer spreading. If inflammation is recognized to favor the formation of vascular "metastatic niches," little is known about the contribution of blood rheology to CTC deposition. Herein, a microfluidic chip, covered by a confluent monolayer of endothelial cells, is used for analyzing the adhesion and rolling of colorectal (HCT-15) and breast (MDA-MB-231) cancer cells under different biophysical conditions. These include the analysis of cell transport in a physiological solution and whole blood over a healthy and a TNF-α inflamed endothelium with a flow rate of 50 and 100 nl/min. Upon stimulation of the endothelial monolayer with TNF-α (25 ng/ml), CTC adhesion increases from 2 to 4 times whilst cell rolling velocity only slightly reduces. Notably, whole blood also enhances cancer cell deposition from 2 to 3 times, but only on the unstimulated vasculature. For all tested conditions, no statistically significant difference is observed between the two cancer cell types. Finally, a computational model for CTC transport demonstrates that a rigid cell approximation reasonably predicts rolling velocities while cell deformability is needed to model adhesion. These results would suggest that, within microvascular networks, blood rheology and inflammation contribute similarly to CTC deposition, thereby facilitating the formation of metastatic niches along the entire network, including the healthy endothelium. In microfluidic-based assays, neglecting blood rheology would significantly underestimate the metastatic potential of cancer cells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.