ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2018
Effects of
Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2020Pooled it
- Anti-Thrombotic and Metabolic Protective Effects of Ginseng in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Rats: In Vivo Evaluation with In Silico Mechanistic Prediction.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The Hypoglycemic and Hypocholesterolemic Activity ofNutrients · 2023Article
- Effects ofJournal of ginseng research · 2022Review
- Effect of mushrooms on obesity in animal models: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- The Effect of Modified Sini Decoction on Survival Rates of Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Related Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the antiobesity effects of
methodsWe conducted a systematic search for all controlled trials (up to March 2017) that assessed the antiobesity effects of
resultWe identified 16 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data from the meta-analysis indicated that the intervention group had a significantly lower body weight than the control group (SMD: -1.50, 95% CI: -1.90 to -1.11,
conclusionOur meta-analysis indicated that oral administration of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.