Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29861543›Full record

ArticleGlobal biogeochemical cycles2018

Mercury in the Black Sea: New Insights From Measurements and Numerical Modeling.

G Rosati, L E Heimbürger, D Melaku Canu, C Lagane, L Laffont, M J A Rijkenberg, L J A Gerringa, C Solidoro, C N Gencarelli, I M Hedgecock and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global biogeochemical cycles, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expression Levels ofEnvironmental science & technology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

G RosatiOGS, National Institute of Oceanography and Experimental Geophysics, OCE Research Section, ECHO Group Trieste Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-0488
L E HeimbürgerAix Marseille Université, CNRS/INSU, Université de Toulon, IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography UM 110 Marseille France.ORCID 0000-0003-0632-5183
D Melaku CanuOGS, National Institute of Oceanography and Experimental Geophysics, OCE Research Section, ECHO Group Trieste Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1853-2115
C LaganeObservatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Laboratoire Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université Paul-Sabatier Toulouse France.
L LaffontObservatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Laboratoire Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université Paul-Sabatier Toulouse France.
M J A RijkenbergNIOZ, Royal Institute for Sea Research, department of GCO Utrecht University Den Burg Netherlands.
L J A GerringaNIOZ, Royal Institute for Sea Research, department of GCO Utrecht University Den Burg Netherlands.
C SolidoroOGS, National Institute of Oceanography and Experimental Geophysics, OCE Research Section, ECHO Group Trieste Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2354-4302
C N GencarelliCNR, Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Division of Rende, UNICAL-Polifunzionale Rende Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2366-661X
I M HedgecockCNR, Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Division of Rende, UNICAL-Polifunzionale Rende Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-1870
H J W De BaarNIOZ, Royal Institute for Sea Research, department of GCO Utrecht University Den Burg Netherlands.
J E SonkeObservatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Laboratoire Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, CNRS/IRD/Université Paul-Sabatier Toulouse France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUtrecht University · NLInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research · ITNational Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics · ITThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redox conditions and organic matter control marine methylmercury (MeHg) production. The Black Sea is the world's largest and deepest anoxic basin and is thus ideal to study Hg species along the extended redox gradient. Here we present new dissolved Hg and MeHg data from the 2013 GEOTRACES MEDBlack cruise (GN04_leg2) that we integrated into a numerical 1-D model, to track the fate and dynamics of Hg and MeHg. Contrary to a previous study, our new data show highest MeHg concentrations in the permanently anoxic waters. Observed MeHg/Hg percentage (range 9-57%) in the anoxic waters is comparable to other subsurface maxima in oxic open-ocean waters. With the modeling we tested for various Hg methylation and demethylation scenarios along the redox gradient. The results show that Hg methylation must occur in the anoxic waters. The model was then used to simulate the time evolution (1850-2050) of Hg species in the Black Sea. Our findings quantify (1) inputs and outputs of Hg

Indexed as

anoxiaGEOTRACESmercurymethylationmethylmercurysulfide

Identifiers

PMID29861543
PMCPMC5969270
OpenAlexW2793793318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.