Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29861509›Full record

ReviewThe Quarterly review of biology2017

PRINCIPLES AND PATTERNS OF BAT MOVEMENTS: FROM AERODYNAMICS TO ECOLOGY.

Christian C Voigt, Winifred F Frick, Marc W Holderied, Richard Holland, Gerald Kerth, Marco A R Mello, Raina K Plowright, Sharon Swartz, Yossi Yovel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Quarterly review of biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The evolution of gestation length in eutherian mammals.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Bat Motion can be Described by Leap Frogging.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Christian C VoigtDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research 10315 Berlin, Germany, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Winifred F FrickBat Conservation International Austin, Texas 78716 USA, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, California 95064 USA.
Marc W HolderiedSchool of Biological Sciences, Bristol University Bristol BS8 1TQ United Kingdom.
Richard HollandSchool of Biological Sciences, Bangor University Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW United Kingdom.
Gerald KerthApplied Zoology and Conservation, University of Greifswald D-17489 Greifswald, Germany.
Marco A R MelloDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Minas Gerais 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Raina K PlowrightDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University Bozeman, Montana 59717 USA.
Sharon SwartzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and School of Engineering, Brown University Providence, Rhode Island 02912 USA.
Yossi YovelDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, and the "Sagol" School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Bangor University · GBBat Conservation International · USBrown University · USLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DEMontana State University · USTel Aviv University · ILUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Pilot Grants ProgramP30GM110732 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI QUINN, MARK T · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement ecology as an integrative discipline has advanced associated fields because it presents not only a conceptual framework for understanding movement principles but also helps formulate predictions about the consequences of movements for animals and their environments. Here, we synthesize recent studies on principles and patterns of bat movements in context of the movement ecology paradigm. The motion capacity of bats is defined by their highly articulated, flexible wings. Power production during flight follows a U-shaped curve in relation to speed in bats yet, in contrast to birds, bats use mostly exogenous nutrients for sustained flight. The navigation capacity of most bats is dominated by the echolocation system, yet other sensory modalities, including an iron-based magnetic sense, may contribute to navigation depending on a bat's familiarity with the terrain. Patterns derived from these capacities relate to antagonistic and mutualistic interactions with food items. The navigation capacity of bats may influence their sociality, in particular, the extent of group foraging based on eavesdropping on conspecifics' echolocation calls. We infer that understanding the movement ecology of bats within the framework of the movement ecology paradigm provides new insights into ecological processes mediated by bats, from ecosystem services to diseases.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMovementSocial BehaviorSpatial NavigationAnimalsChiropteraFlight, AnimalZoonosesbiomechanicscognitionecholocationemerging infectious diseasesenergeticsmigrationmutualismsociality

Identifiers

PMID29861509
PMCPMC5983048
OpenAlexW2747777689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.