Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29861410›Full record

SynthesisEBioMedicine2018

RankProd Combined with Genetic Algorithm Optimized Artificial Neural Network Establishes a Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction Model that Revealed C1QTNF3 as a Biomarker for Prostate Cancer.

Qi Hou, Zhi-Tong Bing, Cheng Hu, Mao-Yin Li, Ke-Hu Yang, Zu Mo, Xiang-Wei Xie, Ji-Lin Liao, Yan Lu, Shigeo Horie and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in EBioMedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pediatric Crohn's disease diagnosis aidFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qi HouPost-Doctoral Research Center, Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen Clinical Medical Institute, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518116, China; Department of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 1138421, Japan.
Zhi-Tong BingEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Cheng HuDepartment of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Mao-Yin LiDepartment of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Ke-Hu YangEvidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Zu MoDepartment of Urology, Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen Clinical Medical Institute, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Xiang-Wei XieDepartment of Urology, Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen Clinical Medical Institute, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Ji-Lin LiaoDepartment of Urology, Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen Clinical Medical Institute, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Yan LuDepartment of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 1138421, Japan.
Shigeo HorieDepartment of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 1138421, Japan.
Ming-Wu LouPost-Doctoral Research Center, Longgang Central Hospital, Shenzhen Clinical Medical Institute, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518116, China. Electronic address: mingwulou@sina.com.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNJuntendo University · JPLanzhou University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in males in the Western world. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been widely used as a biomarker for PCa diagnosis, its results can be controversial. Therefore, new biomarkers are needed to enhance the clinical management of PCa. From publicly available microarray data, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by meta-analysis with RankProd. Genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network (GA-ANN) was introduced to establish a diagnostic prediction model and to filter candidate genes. The diagnostic and prognostic capability of the prediction model and candidate genes were investigated in both GEO and TCGA datasets. Candidate genes were further validated by qPCR, Western Blot and Tissue microarray. By RankProd meta-analyses, 2306 significantly up- and 1311 down-regulated probes were found in 133 cases and 30 controls microarray data. The overall accuracy rate of the PCa diagnostic prediction model, consisting of a 15-gene signature, reached up to 100% in both the training and test dataset. The prediction model also showed good results for the diagnosis (AUC = 0.953) and prognosis (AUC of 5 years overall survival time = 0.808) of PCa in the TCGA database. The expression levels of three genes, FABP5, C1QTNF3 and LPHN3, were validated by qPCR. C1QTNF3 high expression was further validated in PCa tissue by Western Blot and Tissue microarray. In the GEO datasets, C1QTNF3 was a good predictor for the diagnosis of PCa (GSE6956: AUC = 0.791; GSE8218: AUC = 0.868; GSE26910: AUC = 0.972). In the TCGA database, C1QTNF3 was significantly associated with PCa patient recurrence free survival (P < .001, AUC = 0.57). In this study, we have developed a diagnostic and prognostic prediction model for PCa. C1QTNF3 was revealed as a promising biomarker for PCa. This approach can be applied to other high-throughput data from different platforms for the discovery of oncogenes or biomarkers in different kinds of diseases.

Indexed as

PrognosisBiomarkers, TumorFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, PeptideTissue Array AnalysisTumor Necrosis FactorsADGRL3 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorC1QTNF3 protein, humanFABP5 protein, humanFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, PeptideTumor Necrosis FactorsArtificial neural networkBiomarkerGenetic algorithmProstate cancerRankProd

Identifiers

PMID29861410
PMCPMC6021271
OpenAlexW2805508285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.