Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29861286›Full record

ArticleNeuron2018

Active Sampling State Dynamically Enhances Olfactory Bulb Odor Representation.

Rebecca Jordan, Izumi Fukunaga, Mihaly Kollo, Andreas T Schaefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca JordanNeurophysiology of Behaviour Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 5AT, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Izumi FukunagaNeurophysiology of Behaviour Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 5AT, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Mihaly KolloNeurophysiology of Behaviour Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 5AT, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andreas T SchaeferNeurophysiology of Behaviour Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 5AT, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology & Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: andreas.schaefer@crick.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1202/5Wellcome Trust FC001153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olfactory bulb (OB) is the first site of synaptic odor information processing, yet a wealth of contextual and learned information has been described in its activity. To investigate the mechanistic basis of contextual modulation, we use whole-cell recordings to measure odor responses across rapid learning episodes in identified mitral/tufted cells (MTCs). Across these learning episodes, diverse response changes occur already during the first sniff cycle. Motivated mice develop active sniffing strategies across learning that robustly correspond to the odor response changes, resulting in enhanced odor representation. Evoking fast sniffing in different behavioral states demonstrates that response changes during active sampling exceed those predicted from feedforward input alone. Finally, response changes are highly correlated in tufted cells, but not mitral cells, indicating there are cell-type-specific effects on odor representation during active sampling. Altogether, we show that active sampling is strongly associated with enhanced OB responsiveness on rapid timescales.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDiscrimination LearningLearningMiceOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysPatch-Clamp TechniquesTime Factorsactive samplingbehaviorcontextlearningolfactionolfactory bulbsniffing

Identifiers

PMID29861286
PMCPMC6030445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.