Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29861116›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2018

Detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer (preSANO): a prospective multicentre, diagnostic cohort study.

Bo Jan Noordman, Manon C W Spaander, Roelf Valkema, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Joël Shapiro, Katharina Biermann, Ate van der Gaast, Richard van Hillegersberg, Maarten C C M Hulshof and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04886635 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Cohort Study on Active Surveillance After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Oesophageal Cancer: SANO-2 Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBas P. L. WijnhovenRan2021 to 2029Enrolled360ConditionsCancer of EsophagusArmsActive surveillance
NCT07317609 phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy Sequenced With Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Cancer (Endosurgery-02)

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)ArmsTislelizumab, Carboplatin, Nab-paclitaxel, Endoscopic resection, Esophagectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 326 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of tumor regression by neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Localized Microsatellite Instability High/Deficient Mismatch Repair Solid Tumors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  8. A first-in-human study of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Trial
  9. Dose escalation based onRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Bo Jan NoordmanDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: b.noordman@erasmusmc.nl.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Roelf ValkemaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Bas P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mark I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Joël ShapiroDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Katharina BiermannDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ate van der GaastDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Maarten C C M HulshofDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kausilia K KrishnadathDepartment of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sjoerd M LagardeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Grard A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Liekele E OostenbrugDepartment of Gastroenterology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Peter D SiersemaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Erik J SchoonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Meindert N SosefDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
J Jan B van LanschotDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
SANO study group
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer, roughly half of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma and a quarter of those with adenocarcinoma have a pathological complete response of the primary tumour before surgery. Thus, the necessity of standard oesophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be reconsidered for patients who respond sufficiently to neoadjuvant treatment. In this study, we aimed to establish the accuracy of detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with different diagnostic approaches, and the optimal combination of diagnostic techniques for clinical response evaluations.

methodsThe preSANO trial was a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic cohort study at six centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had histologically proven, resectable, squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction, and were eligible for potential curative therapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (five weekly cycles of carboplatin [area under the curve 2 mg/mL per min] plus paclitaxel [50 mg/m

findingsBetween July 22, 2013, and Dec 28, 2016, 219 patients were included, 207 of whom were included in the analyses. Eight of 26 TRG3 or TRG4 tumours (31% [95% CI 17-50]) were missed by endoscopy with regular biopsies and fine-needle aspiration. Four of 41 TRG3 or TRG4 tumours (10% [95% CI 4-23]) were missed with bite-on-bite biopsies and fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopic ultrasonography with maximum tumour thickness measurement missed TRG3 or TRG4 residual tumours in 11 of 39 patients (28% [95% CI 17-44]). PET-CT missed six of 41 TRG3 or TRG4 tumours (15% [95% CI 7-28]). PET-CT detected interval distant histologically proven metastases in 18 (9%) of 190 patients (one squamous cell carcinoma, 17 adenocarcinomas).

interpretationAfter neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer, clinical response evaluation with endoscopic ultrasonography, bite-on-bite biopsies, and fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes was adequate for detection of locoregional residual disease, with PET-CT for detection of interval metastases. Active surveillance with this combination of diagnostic modalities is now being assessed in a phase 3 randomised controlled trial (SANO trial; Netherlands Trial Register NTR6803).

fundingDutch Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBiopsy, Fine-NeedleChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalEndosonographyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID29861116
OpenAlexW2805710293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.