Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860830›Full record

ReviewACS infectious diseases2018

A Comparison of Optical, Electrochemical, Magnetic, and Colorimetric Point-of-Care Biosensors for Infectious Disease Diagnosis.

Oleksandra Pashchenko, Tyler Shelby, Tuhina Banerjee, Santimukul Santra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Diagnostic Techniques for Dengue Virus.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biosensors for the detection of flaviviruses: A review.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oleksandra PashchenkoDepartment of Chemistry , Pittsburg State University , 1701 South Broadway Street , Pittsburg , Kansas 66762 , United States.
Tyler ShelbyDepartment of Chemistry , Pittsburg State University , 1701 South Broadway Street , Pittsburg , Kansas 66762 , United States.
Tuhina BanerjeeDepartment of Chemistry , Pittsburg State University , 1701 South Broadway Street , Pittsburg , Kansas 66762 , United States.
Santimukul SantraDepartment of Chemistry , Pittsburg State University , 1701 South Broadway Street , Pittsburg , Kansas 66762 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5047-5245

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Douglas E Wright · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
"Magnetic Resonance Nanosensors for the Rapid Diagnosis of Influenza and Investigation of Viral Binding and Fusion Mechanisms"R03AI132832 · NIAID · PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTRA, SANTIMUKUL · 2017 to 2018
$138k
NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI132832NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year, infectious diseases are responsible for millions of deaths, most of which occur in the rural areas of developing countries. Many of the infectious disease diagnostic tools used today require a great deal of time, a laboratory setting, and trained personnel. Due to this, the need for effective point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools is greatly increasing with an emphasis on affordability, portability, sensitivity, specificity, timeliness, and ease of use. In this Review, we discuss the various diagnostic modalities that have been utilized toward this end and are being further developed to create POC diagnostic technologies, and we focus on potential effectiveness in resource-limited settings. The main modalities discussed herein are optical-, electrochemical-, magnetic-, and colorimetric-based modalities utilized in diagnostic technologies for infectious diseases. Each of these modalities feature pros and cons when considering application in POC settings but, overall, reveal a promising outlook for the future of this field of technological development.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingBiosensing TechniquesColorimetryCommunicable DiseasesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineElectrochemical TechniquesHumansMagnetic PhenomenaOptical DevicesSensitivity and Specificitybiosensorsdetectiondiagnosisinfectious diseasespoint-of-care

Identifiers

PMID29860830
PMCPMC6736529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.