Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860678›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2018

Evaluation of liver function using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging based on a three-dimensional volumetric analysis system.

Masashi Kudo, Naoto Gotohda, Motokazu Sugimoto, Tatsushi Kobayashi, Motohiro Kojima, Shinichiro Takahashi, Masaru Konishi, Ryuichi Hayashi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Value of ALBI grade on precised estimation liver reserve function of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Masashi KudoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Naoto GotohdaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan. ngotohda@east.ncc.go.jp.
Motokazu SugimotoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Tatsushi KobayashiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Motohiro KojimaDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shinichiro TakahashiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Masaru KonishiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwa-no-ha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Ryuichi HayashiCourse of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (EOB-MRI) is a diagnostic modality for liver tumors. Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric analysis systems using EOB-MRI data are used to simulate liver anatomy for surgery. This study was conducted to investigate clinical utility of a 3D volumetric analysis system on EOB-MRI to evaluate liver function.

methodsBetween August 2014 and December 2015, 181 patients underwent laboratory and radiological exams as standardized preoperative evaluation for liver surgery. The liver-spleen contrast-enhanced ratio (LSR) was measured by a semi-automated 3D volumetric analysis system on EOB-MRI. First, the inter-evaluator variability of the calculated LSR was evaluated. Additionally, a subset of liver surgical specimens was evaluated histologically by using immunohistochemical staining. Finally, the correlations between the LSR and grading systems of liver function, laboratory data, or histological findings were analyzed.

resultsThe inter-evaluator correlation coefficient of the measured LSR was 0.986. The mean LSR was significantly correlated with the Child-Pugh score (p = 0.014) and the ALBI score (p < 0.001). Significant correlations were also observed between the LSR and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (r = - 0.601, p < 0.001), between the LSR and liver fibrosis stage (r = - 0.556, p < 0.001), and between the LSR and liver steatosis grade (r = - 0.396, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe LSR calculated by a 3D volumetric analysis system on EOB-MRI was highly reproducible and was shown to be correlated with liver function parameters and liver histology. These data suggest that this imaging modality can be a reliable tool to evaluate liver function.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaGadolinium DTPALiver Function TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAGadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acidLiver functionLiver steatosisMagnetic resonance imagingThree-dimensional volumetric analysis system

Identifiers

PMID29860678
PMCPMC6096956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.