Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860663›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2018

In vitro comparison of an Er:YAG laser-activated bleaching system with different light-activated bleaching systems for color change, surface roughness, and enamel bond strength.

Esra Ergin, A Ruya Yazici, Bercem Kalender, Aslihan Usumez, Atilla Ertan, Jale Gorucu, Tugrul Sari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esra ErginDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
A Ruya YaziciDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Bercem KalenderDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. brcmklndr@gmail.com.
Aslihan Usumez, Istanbul, Turkey.
Atilla ErtanDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Jale GorucuDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Tugrul Sari, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TRBaşkent University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare an Er:YAG laser-activated bleaching system with different light-activated in-office bleaching systems for color change, surface roughness, and post-bleaching enamel bond strength. 51 enamel slabs were prepared from the sound buccal enamel of extracted bovine teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to different light-activated office bleaching systems (n = 17): diode laser (Epic, Biolase) (940 nm, 7 W, continuous mode), Er:YAG laser (LightWalker, Fotona) (2940 nm, 50 mJ, 10 Hz, 1000 μs), and LED (Radii Plus) (440-480 nm, 1500 mW/cm

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLightTooth BleachingAnimalsCattleColorDental EnamelLasers, SemiconductorSurface PropertiesBleachingDiode laserEr:YAG laserLight emitting diodeRoughnessShear bond strength

Identifiers

PMID29860663
OpenAlexW2807467441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.