Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860641›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics2018

Fitting of dynamic recurrent neural network models to sensory stimulus-response data.

R Ozgur Doruk, Kechen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Ozgur DorukDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Atilim University, Kizilcasar Mahallesi, Incek, Golbasi, Ankara, 06836, Turkey. resat.doruk@atilim.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-0845
Kechen ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Avenue, Traylor 407, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

CRCNS: Optimality principles of auditory representationsR01DC013698 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, KECHEN · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a theoretical study aiming at model fitting for sensory neurons. Conventional neural network training approaches are not applicable to this problem due to lack of continuous data. Although the stimulus can be considered as a smooth time-dependent variable, the associated response will be a set of neural spike timings (roughly the instants of successive action potential peaks) that have no amplitude information. A recurrent neural network model can be fitted to such a stimulus-response data pair by using the maximum likelihood estimation method where the likelihood function is derived from Poisson statistics of neural spiking. The universal approximation feature of the recurrent dynamical neuron network models allows us to describe excitatory-inhibitory characteristics of an actual sensory neural network with any desired number of neurons. The stimulus data are generated by a phased cosine Fourier series having a fixed amplitude and frequency but a randomly shot phase. Various values of amplitude, stimulus component size, and sample size are applied in order to examine the effect of the stimulus to the identification process. Results are presented in tabular and graphical forms at the end of this text. In addition, to demonstrate the success of this research, a study involving the same model, nominal parameters and stimulus structure, and another study that works on different models are compared to that of this research.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsElectric StimulationModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSensory Receptor CellsExcitatory neuronInhibitory neuronMaximum likelihood estimationNeural spikingRecurrent neural networkSensory neurons

Identifiers

PMID29860641
PMCPMC6082798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.