Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860629›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

The effect of conscious intention to act on the Bereitschaftspotential.

Shiro Takashima, André M Cravo, Koichi Sameshima, Renato T Ramos

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors that influence the amplitude of the bereitschaftspotential.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. What Is the Readiness Potential?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Cerebral preparation of spontaneous movements: An EEG study.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shiro TakashimaDepartment of Psychiatry, LIM23, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-Cerqueira César, 05403010, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. takashima.shiro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-9198
André M CravoCentro de Matemática Computação e Cognição, Universidade Federal do ABC, R. Santa Adélia, 166-Bangu, 09210170, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Koichi SameshimaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455-Cerqueira César, 05403010, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Renato T RamosDepartment of Psychiatry, LIM23, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-Cerqueira César, 05403010, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2011/21357-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study investigated the effect of conscious intention to act on the Bereitschaftspotential. Situations in which the awareness of acting is minimally expressed were generated by asking 16 participants to press a button after performing a mental imagery task based on animal pictures (automatic condition). The affective responses induced by the pictures were controlled by selecting the animals according to different valences, threatening and neutral. The Bereitschaftspotential associated with the button presses was compared to the observed when similar movements were performed under the basic instructions of the self-paced movement paradigm (willed condition). Enhanced Bereitschaftspotential amplitudes were observed in the willed condition with respect to the automatic condition. This effect was manifested as a negative slope at medial frontocentral sites during the last 500 ms before movement onset. The valence of the pictures did not affect the motor preparatory potentials. The results suggest that significant part of the NS' subcomponent of the readiness potential is associated with the attention to-and, presumably, awareness of-intention to move, possibly reflecting cortical activation from supplementary motor areas. Secondarily, our findings supports that the feeling of threat does not influence the Bereitschaftspotential associated with automatic movements. Regarding methodological issues, the behavioural model of spontaneous voluntary movements proposed in automatic condition can benefit investigations on purely motor (or non-cognitive) subcomponents of the Bereitschaftspotential.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultAttentionAwarenessCerebral CortexConsciousnessContingent Negative VariationFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityPattern Recognition, VisualVolitionYoung AdultBereitschaftspotentialConscious intentionEEGReadiness potentialVolition

Identifiers

PMID29860629
OpenAlexW2806089842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.