Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860451›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgery2019

Does Stereotactic Radiosurgery Have a Role in the Management of Patients Presenting With 4 or More Brain Metastases?

Michael H Soike, Ryan T Hughes, Michael Farris, Emory R McTyre, Christina K Cramer, J D Bourland, Michael D Chan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05477316 (A Single-arm Pilot Study, to Assess the Efficacy of Cerebellar IMRT Combined With Cerebral SRS in Patients With Brain Metastases That Are Predominantly in the Posterior Fossa - a Novel Treatment Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05477316 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Single-arm Pilot Study, to Assess the Efficacy of Cerebellar IMRT Combined With Cerebral SRS in Patients With Brain Metastases That Are Predominantly in the Posterior Fossa - a Novel Treatment Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorHadassah Medical OrganizationRan2021 to 2024Enrolled37ConditionsBrain Metastases, Posterior Fossa Lesion, Cerebral LesionArmsRadiation treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment Options for Brain Metastases.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Tumor-dose-rate variations during robotic radiosurgery of oligo and multiple brain metastases.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael H SoikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Ryan T HughesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Michael FarrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Emory R McTyreDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Christina K CramerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
J D BourlandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Michael D ChanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) are effective treatments for management of brain metastases. Prospective trials comparing the 2 modalities in patients with fewer than 4 brain metastases demonstrate that overall survival (OS) is similar. Intracranial failure is more common after SRS, while WBRT is associated with neurocognitive decline. As technology has advanced, fewer technical obstacles remain for treating patients with 4 or more brain metastases with SRS, but level I data supporting its use are lacking.  Observational prospective studies and retrospective series indicate that in patients with 4 or more brain metastases, performance status, total volume of intracranial disease, histology, and rate of development of new brain metastases predict outcomes more accurately than the number of brain metastases. It may be reasonable to initially offer SRS to some patients with 4 or more brain metastases. Initiating therapy with SRS avoids the acute and late sequelae of WBRT. Multiple phase III trials of SRS vs WBRT, both currently open or under development, are directly comparing quality of life and OS for patients with 4 or more brain metastases to help answer the question of SRS appropriateness for these patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicCranial IrradiationDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBrain metastasesStereotactic radiosurgeryWhole brain radiation

Identifiers

PMID29860451
PMCPMC6904415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.