Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29860084›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Amygdala functional connectivity during socioemotional processing prospectively predicts increases in internalizing symptoms in a sample of low-income, urban, young men.

Arianna M Gard, Rebecca Waller, Johnna R Swartz, Daniel S Shaw, Erika E Forbes, Luke W Hyde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Individual-specific functional connectivity of the amygdala: A substrate for precision psychiatry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arianna M GardDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rebecca WallerDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Johnna R SwartzDepartment of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Daniel S ShawDepartment of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Erika E ForbesDepartment of Psychology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Luke W HydeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Center for Human Growth and Development & Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: lukehyde@umich.edu.

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY ALCOHOLISM RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32AA007477 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Maureen A. Walton · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGYT32HD007109 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GELMAN, SUSAN A., MONK, CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN · 1985 to 2025
$6.6M
PRECURSORS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR--FOLLOW UP TO AGE 6R01MH050907 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHAW, DANIEL S · 1994 to 2008
$5.1M
Substance Use in Young Men: Genes, Brain Function & Early Social DevelopmentR01DA026222 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FORBES, ERIKA E, SHAW, DANIEL S · 2009 to 2013
$4.0M
UNDERSTANDING CHILDHOOD CONDUCT PROBLEMS AND DEPRESSIONK02MH001666 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHAW, DANIEL S · 1999 to 2008
$995k
New Methods in Basic and Applied Research on Drug Use RiskK05DA025630 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHAW, DANIEL S · 2009 to 2013
$637k
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007477NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007109NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA025630NIDA NIH HHS L40 DA036468NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026222NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH001666NIMH NIH HHS L40 MH108392NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex is critical for socioemotional processing, particularly during face processing. Though processing others' emotions is important for a myriad of complex social behaviors, more research is needed to understand how different types of emotional facial expressions differentially elicit connectivity of the amygdala with widespread neural regions. Moreover, though prior studies have reported cross-sectional associations between altered amygdala-prefrontal cortex functional connectivity and internalizing symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety), few studies have examined whether amygdala functional connectivity is prospectively related to changes in these symptoms, with little work focusing on low-income men living in stressful contexts. The current study used psycho-physiological interaction analyses at the within-subjects level to examine how amygdala connectivity differed while participants viewed fearful, angry, and neutral faces. We used structural equation modeling at the between-subjects level, using extracted parameter estimates, to test whether amygdala connectivity during face processing predicted increases in internalizing psychopathology over time, controlling for earlier symptoms. An urban sample of 167 young men from low-income families was employed. Results indicated that negative connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal regions was modulated by emotional face type. Neuronal activity in the cingulate and frontal cortices was connected to amygdala reactivity during fearful and neutral, but not angry, face processing. Moreover, weaker left amygdala-left middle frontal gyrus negative connectivity when viewing fearful faces and stronger right amygdala-left inferior frontal gyrus negative connectivity when viewing neutral faces at age 20 both predicted increases in internalizing behaviors from age 20 to age 22. Our findings show that amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity can predict the persistence of internalizing symptoms among high-risk participants over time but suggest that these patterns may differ depending on the emotional stimuli examined.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionSocial BehaviorAmygdalaBrain MappingCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPovertyPrefrontal CortexUrban PopulationYoung AdultAmygdalaEmotional processingFunctional connectivityInternalizingStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID29860084
PMCPMC6046277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.