Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29859849›Full record

Trial reportNeuropharmacology2018

Amphetamine improves mouse and human attention in the 5-choice continuous performance test.

David A MacQueen, Arpi Minassian, Johnny A Kenton, Mark A Geyer, William Perry, Jonathan L Brigman, Jared W Young

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evidence for pro-cognitive benefits of cannabinoids in people with bipolar disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  4. EEG reveals that dextroamphetamine improves cognitive control through multiple processes in healthy participants.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David A MacQueenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0804, USA; Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Arpi MinassianDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0804, USA; Center for Stress and Mental Health (CESAMH), VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
Johnny A KentonDepartment of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Mark A GeyerDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0804, USA; Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
William PerryDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0804, USA.
Jonathan L BrigmanDepartment of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Jared W YoungDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0804, USA; Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: jaredyoung@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

University of New Mexico (UNM) Center for Brain Recovery and RepairP20GM109089 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI SHUTTLEWORTH, CLAUDE W · 2015 to 2024
$22.7M
Cross-species studies of smoking effects on cognition and neuroinflammation in HIVR01DA044909 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BRODY, ARTHUR, YOUNG, JARED WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$4.3M
Inhibitory Deficits in Mania and Hyperdopaminiergic MiceR01MH071916 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GEYER, MARK A, PERRY, WILLIAM · 2004 to 2014
$4.2M
Alcohol Research Training in NeurosciencesT32AA014127 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Jonathan L Brigman · 2003 to 2026
$3.3M
Cannabis use and the endocannabinoid system in bipolar disorderR01DA043535 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PERRY, WILLIAM, YOUNG, JARED WILLIAM · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
A model organism of brain circuitry and behavioral switching for bipolar disorderR01MH104344 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YOUNG, JARED WILLIAM · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
Prenatal alcohol exposure and corticostriatal mediation of behavioral flexibilityR01AA025652 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BRIGMAN, JONATHAN L · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025652NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA014127NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043535NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044909NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109089NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071916NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-medical use of prescription stimulants amongst college students is common, with claims of cognitive and academic benefits. The mechanism, magnitude, and pervasiveness of the cognitive enhancing effects of stimulants in healthy adults remain poorly understood however. The present study determined the effects of dextroamphetamine (D-amp) on the 5-choice continuous performance test (5C-CPT) of attention in healthy young adult humans and mice. A mixed gender sample received placebo (n = 29), 10 (n = 17) or 20 mg D-amp (n = 25) in a double-blind fashion before 5C-CPT testing. In addition, male C57BL/6J mice were trained on a touchscreen adaptation of the 5C-CPT and tested after receiving saline or D-amp (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg; n = 8/dose). In humans, D-amp significantly improved 5C-CPT performance. Both doses improved signal detection driven by increased hit rate (reduced omissions). Both doses also improved response accuracy and reduced hit reaction time (HRT) variability. In mice, similar effects (improved signal detection, hit rate, and response accuracy) were observed at the moderate dose (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast to human participants however, no effect on HRT variability was detected in mice, with no effect on HRT in either species. Human 5C-CPT performance was consistent with prior studies and consistent with alternative CPT paradigms. The performance of C57BL/6J mice on the touchscreen 5C-CPT mirrored performance of this strain on 5-hole operant chambers. Importantly, comparable facilitation of attention with D-amp was observed in both species. The 5C-CPT provides a cross-species paradigm by which the cognitive enhancing properties of stimulants and the neural underpinnings of attention can be assessed.

Indexed as

AmphetamineAnimalsAttentionChoice BehaviorDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLNeuropsychological TestsPsychotropic DrugsYoung AdultAmphetaminePsychotropic DrugsADHDAmphetamineAttentionDextroamphetamine (PubChem CID: 5826)StimulantTranslationVigilance

Identifiers

PMID29859849
PMCPMC6340711
OpenAlexW2806619816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.