Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29859103›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2018

Critical review of the safety assessment of titanium dioxide additives in food.

Hans Christian Winkler, Tina Notter, Urs Meyer, Hanspeter Naegeli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Titanium Dioxide (TiOToxics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nanoscatterer-Assisted Fluorescence Amplification Technique.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans Christian WinklerInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schmelzbergstrasse 7, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tina NotterInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Urs MeyerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hanspeter NaegeliInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland. naegelih@vetpharm.uzh.ch.

Funding

Forschungskredit of the University of Zurich FK-15-053Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 406440-141619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterial engineering provides an important technological advance that offers substantial benefits for applications not only in the production and processing, but also in the packaging and storage of food. An expanding commercialization of nanomaterials as part of the modern diet will substantially increase their oral intake worldwide. While the risk of particle inhalation received much attention, gaps of knowledge exist regarding possible adverse health effects due to gastrointestinal exposure. This problem is highlighted by pigment-grade titanium dioxide (TiO

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedEnvironmental ExposureFood AdditivesHumansMiceTitaniumToxicity TestsFood AdditivesTitaniumtitanium dioxideAnataseCancerCoronaDendritic cellsFood additivesFood safetyFood toxicologyInnate immunityLymphoid tissueRutile

Identifiers

PMID29859103
PMCPMC5984422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.