Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29859083›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

Dose-response relationship between cumulative physical workload and osteoarthritis of the hip - a meta-analysis applying an external reference population for exposure assignment.

Andreas Seidler, Laura Lüben, Janice Hegewald, Ulrich Bolm-Audorff, Annekatrin Bergmann, Falk Liebers, Christina Ramdohr, Karla Romero Starke, Alice Freiberg, Susanne Unverzagt

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Work-relatedness of inguinal hernia: a systematic review including meta-analysis and GRADE.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SeidlerInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. ArbSozPH@mailbox.tu-dresden.de.
Laura LübenInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Janice HegewaldInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrich Bolm-AudorffDivision of Occupational Health, Department of Occupational Safety and Environment, Regional Government of South Hesse, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Annekatrin BergmannInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Falk LiebersFederal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Berlin, Germany.
Christina RamdohrInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Karla Romero StarkeInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Alice FreibergInstitute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine (IPAS), Faculty of Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Susanne UnverzagtInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · DEUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is consistent evidence from observational studies of an association between occupational lifting and carrying of heavy loads and the diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis. However, due to the heterogeneity of exposure estimates considered in single studies, a dose-response relationship between cumulative physical workload and hip osteoarthritis could not be determined so far.

methodsThis study aimed to analyze the dose-response relationship between cumulative physical workload and hip osteoarthritis by replacing the exposure categories of the included studies with cumulative exposure values of an external reference population. Our meta-regression analysis was based on a recently conducted systematic review (Bergmann A, Bolm-Audorff U, Krone D, Seidler A, Liebers F, Haerting J, Freiberg A, Unverzagt S, Dtsch Arztebl Int 114:581-8, 2017). The main analysis of our meta-regression comprised six case-control studies for men and five for women. The population control subjects of a German multicentre case-control study (Seidler A, Bergmann A, Jäger M, Ellegast R, Ditchen D, Elsner G, Grifka J, Haerting J, Hofmann F, Linhardt O, Luttmann A, Michaelis M, Petereit-Haack G, Schumann B, Bolm-Audorff U, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:48, 2009) served as the reference population. Based on the sex-specific cumulative exposure percentiles of the reference population, we assigned exposure values to each category of the included studies using three different cumulative exposure parameters. To estimate the doubling dose (the amount of physical workload to double the risk of hip osteoarthritis) on the basis of all available case-control-studies, meta-regression analyses were conducted based on the linear association between exposure values of the reference population and the logarithm of reported odds ratios (ORs) from the included studies.

resultsIn men, the risk to develop hip osteoarthritis was increased by an OR of 1.98 (95% CI 1.20-3.29) per 10,000 tons of weights ≥20 kg handled, 2.08 (95% CI 1.22-3.53) per 10,000 tons handled > 10 times per day and 8.64 (95% CI 1.87-39.91) per 10

conclusionsUnder specific conditions, the application of an external reference population allows for the derivation of a dose-response relationship despite high exposure heterogeneities in the pooled studies.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceWorkloadAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLiftingMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOccupational DiseasesOsteoarthritis, HipRisk FactorsExposure-risk relationshipMeta-regressionOsteoarthritis of the hipPhysical workload

Identifiers

PMID29859083
PMCPMC5984732
OpenAlexW2805917065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.