ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2018
Parallel word processing in the flanker paradigm has a rightward bias.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthographic processing was facilitated by phonologically but not semantically similar distractors: evidence from the visual structure judgment of Mandarin Chinese characters using the Flanker paradigm.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- Effects of flanker size and flanker eccentricity on the spatial integration of orthographic information.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Negative effects of redundant targets.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026Article
- Spanish Readers Skip Articles Regardless of Gender and Number Agreement.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- On the spatial limits of parallel word processing in reading.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Word superiority and sentence superiority effects in post-cued letter-in-string identification.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Tracking the Effects of Eccentricity on the Integration of Orthographic Information From Multiple Words.Journal of cognition · 2025Article
- Attention focused on memory: The episodic flanker effect with letters, words, colors, and pictures.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Parallel phonological processing of Chinese characters revealed by flankers tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Now you see it, now you don't: Flanker presence induces the word concreteness effect.Cognition · 2022Article
- Letter and word identification in the fovea and parafovea.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Attention extends beyond single words in beginning readers.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Advantage of detecting visual events in the right hemifield is affected by reading skill.Vision research · 2020Article
- Letter migration errors reflect spatial pooling of orthographic information.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019Article
- An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading.Neuropsychologia · 2019Article
- Reading skill modulates the effect of parafoveal distractors on foveal lexical decision in deaf students.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reading research is exhibiting growing interest in employing variants of the flanker paradigm to address several questions about reading. The paradigm is particularly suited for investigating parallel word processing, parafoveal-on-foveal influences, and visuospatial attention in a simple but constrained setting. However, this methodological deviation from natural reading warrants careful assessment of the extent to which cognitive processes underlying reading operate similarly in these respective settings. The present study investigated whether readers' distribution of attention in the flanker paradigm resembles that observed during sentence reading; that is, with a rightward bias. Participants made lexical decisions about foveal target words while we manipulated parafoveal flanking words. In line with prior research, we established a parafoveal-on-foveal repetition effect, and this effect was increased for rightward flankers compared with leftward flankers. In a second experiment, we found that, compared with a no-flanker condition, rightward repetition flankers facilitated target processing, while leftward flankers interfered. Additionally, the repetition effect was larger for rightward than for leftward flankers. From these findings, we infer that attention in the flanker paradigm is indeed biased toward the right, and that the flanker paradigm thus provides an effective analogy to natural reading for investigating the role of visuospatial attention. The enhanced parafoveal-on-foveal effects within the attended region further underline the key role of attention in the spatial integration of orthographic information. Lastly, we conclude that future research employing the flanker paradigm should take the asymmetrical aspect of the attentional deployment into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.