Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858975›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2018

Parallel word processing in the flanker paradigm has a rightward bias.

Joshua Snell, Jonathan Grainger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Negative effects of redundant targets.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. On the spatial limits of parallel word processing in reading.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Letter and word identification in the fovea and parafovea.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  12. Attention extends beyond single words in beginning readers.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua SnellLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive & CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. Joshua.Snell@hotmail.com.
Jonathan GraingerLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive & CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Funding

European Research Council ERC742141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading research is exhibiting growing interest in employing variants of the flanker paradigm to address several questions about reading. The paradigm is particularly suited for investigating parallel word processing, parafoveal-on-foveal influences, and visuospatial attention in a simple but constrained setting. However, this methodological deviation from natural reading warrants careful assessment of the extent to which cognitive processes underlying reading operate similarly in these respective settings. The present study investigated whether readers' distribution of attention in the flanker paradigm resembles that observed during sentence reading; that is, with a rightward bias. Participants made lexical decisions about foveal target words while we manipulated parafoveal flanking words. In line with prior research, we established a parafoveal-on-foveal repetition effect, and this effect was increased for rightward flankers compared with leftward flankers. In a second experiment, we found that, compared with a no-flanker condition, rightward repetition flankers facilitated target processing, while leftward flankers interfered. Additionally, the repetition effect was larger for rightward than for leftward flankers. From these findings, we infer that attention in the flanker paradigm is indeed biased toward the right, and that the flanker paradigm thus provides an effective analogy to natural reading for investigating the role of visuospatial attention. The enhanced parafoveal-on-foveal effects within the attended region further underline the key role of attention in the spatial integration of orthographic information. Lastly, we conclude that future research employing the flanker paradigm should take the asymmetrical aspect of the attentional deployment into account.

Indexed as

AttentionFunctional LateralityReadingSpatial ProcessingAdultDecision MakingFemaleFixation, OcularFovea CentralisHumansLearningMaleYoung AdultAttentionOrthographyReading

Identifiers

PMID29858975
PMCPMC6060999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.