Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858923›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

Parameters of skull vibration-induced nystagmus in normal subjects.

Enrique García Zamora, Pedro Espírito-Santo Araújo, Vanesa Pérez Guillén, María Fernanda Vargas Gamarra, Victoria Fornés Ferrer, Magdalena Courel Rauch, Herminio Pérez Garrigues

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Update on Nystagmus and Other Ocular Oscillations.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrique García ZamoraOtoneurology Unit, ENT Department, Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain. enrique.ga.zam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9771-4848
Pedro Espírito-Santo AraújoOtoneurology Unit, ENT Department, Hospital "da Luz", Lisbon, Portugal.
Vanesa Pérez GuillénOtoneurology Unit, ENT Department, Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
María Fernanda Vargas GamarraOtoneurology Unit, ENT Department, Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
Victoria Fornés FerrerUnidad de Bioestadística, Instituto of Investigation Sanitaria "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
Magdalena Courel RauchOtoneurology Unit, ENT Department, Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
Herminio Pérez GarriguesOtoneurology Unit, ENT Department, Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
Leitat Technological Center · ESHospital da Luz · PTInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisThe knowledge of vibration-induced nystagmus test (SVINT) values in the normal population is highly relevant to provide a rapid orientation on the diagnosis attitude in a patient with vertigo.

backgroundAlthough mastoid bone vibration should only induce nystagmus in the presence of vestibular asymmetry, it has also been reported in normal individuals raising doubts as to how to interpret the SVINT. To date, no population studies involving the use of the SVINT and that establish normative values have been published.

methodsThis study was carried out at two tertiary healthcare centres on a total of 122 subjects. We stimulated at three frequencies (30, 60 and 100 Hz), in increasing order, first stimulating the right mastoid and then the left mastoid, and waiting for 30 s between each stimulus. The response was recorded with a videonystagmography system. The following variables were evaluated in each subject: the mean and maximum speed of the slow phase of nystagmus, the frequency of the nystagmatic response (NR) and the component and direction of the rapid phase of nystagmus.

resultsOnly 26 subjects (20.5%) of the subjects studied here (122 subjects) developed any kind of nystagmatic response and 96 subjects (79.5%) did not display any response. Stimulation at 100 Hz provoked the largest number of responses (p = 0.04), while there was no difference in the number of responses induced by 30 and 60 Hz stimulations (p = 0.85). The frequency of nystagmus was ≤ 0.7 n/s in 80.8% of the positive responses. The mean velocity of the horizontal component of the NR was 2.2°/s (SD 1.6) and that of the vertical component was 1.3°/s (SD 1.2).

conclusionsHealthy subjects do not generally develop to NR upon vibratory stimulation and only 20% of the subjects studied here developed any kind of NR, this being a slow and inconsistent response of low frequency. The establishment of normal values contributes to improve the orientation in clinical practice in the pathological population and this opens possibilities for tackling more reliable studies in this population.

Indexed as

VibrationAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMastoidNystagmus, PathologicNormal subjectsSkull vibration-induced nystagmus

Identifiers

PMID29858923
OpenAlexW2807627374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.