Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858655›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Implant preloading in extension reduces spring length change in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization: a biomechanical study on passive kinematics of the knee.

Janosch Häberli, Benjamin Voumard, Clemens Kösters, Daniel Delfosse, Philipp Henle, Stefan Eggli, Philippe Zysset

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization for ACL repair: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Janosch HäberliSonnenhof Orthopaedic Centre, Buchserstrasse 30, 3006, Bern, Switzerland. janosch.haeberli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-0795
Benjamin VoumardInstitute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland.
Clemens KöstersUniversity Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Daniel DelfosseMathys Ltd., Robert-Mathys-Strasse 5, 2455, Bettlach, Switzerland.
Philipp HenleSonnenhof Orthopaedic Centre, Buchserstrasse 30, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan EggliSonnenhof Orthopaedic Centre, Buchserstrasse 30, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.
Philippe ZyssetInstitute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland.
Klinik Sonnenhof · CHUniversity of Bern · CHMathys (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) is a primary repair technique for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. For internal bracing of the sutured ACL, a metal spring with 8 mm maximum length change is preloaded with 60-80 N and fixed to a high-strength polyethylene braid. The bulky tibial hardware results in bone loss and may cause local discomfort with the necessity of hardware removal. The technique has been previously investigated biomechanically; however, the amount of spring shortening during movement of the knee joint is unknown. Spring shortening is a crucial measure, because it defines the necessary dimensions of the spring and, therefore, the overall size of the implant.

methodsSeven Thiel-fixated human cadaveric knee joints were subjected to passive range of motion (flexion/extension, internal/external rotation in 90° flexion, and varus/valgus stress in 0° and 20° flexion) and stability tests (Lachman/KT-1000 testing in 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° flexion) in the ACL-intact, ACL-transected, and DIS-repaired state. Kinematic data of femur, tibia, and implant spring were recorded with an optical measurement system (Optotrak) and the positions of the bone tunnels were assessed by computed tomography. Length change of bone tunnel distance as a surrogate for spring shortening was then computed from kinematic data. Tunnel positioning in a circular zone with r = 5 mm was simulated to account for surgical precision and its influence on length change was assessed.

resultsOver all range of motion and stability tests, spring shortening was highest (5.0 ± 0.2 mm) during varus stress in 0° knee flexion. During flexion/extension, spring shortening was always highest in full extension (3.8 ± 0.3 mm) for all specimens and all simulations of bone tunnels. Tunnel distance shortening was highest (0.15 mm/°) for posterior femoral and posterior tibial tunnel positioning and lowest (0.03 mm/°) for anterior femoral and anterior tibial tunnel positioning.

conclusionDuring passive flexion/extension, the highest spring shortening was consistently measured in full extension with a continuous decrease towards flexion. If preloading of the spring is performed in extension, the spring can be downsized to incorporate a maximum length change of 5 mm resulting in a smaller implant with less bone sacrifice and, therefore, improved conditions in case of revision surgery.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularACL repairAnterior tibial translationDynamic intraligamentary stabilizationKnee kinematics

Identifiers

PMID29858655
OpenAlexW2806449135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.