Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858639›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Editorial Comment: Advances in MRI and PET of the prostate: concurrence or complementarity?

Raphaële Renard-Penna, Mathieu Gauthé, Jean-Noël Talbot

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raphaële Renard-PennaAcademic Departments of Radiology, Tenon and Pitié-Salpétrière Hospitals, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. raphaele.renardpenna@aphp.fr.
Mathieu GauthéMédecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon AP-HP, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Jean-Noël TalbotMédecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Tenon AP-HP, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Editorial Comment refers to the articles "Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population" by Barrett T et al., Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec 8 and "18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI for preoperative lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer patients" by Selnæs KM et al., Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan 2.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29858639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.