ArticleEuropean radiology2018
Task-based quantification of image quality using a model observer in abdominal CT: a multicentre study.
Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of deep-learning iterative reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels in CT: a task-based image quality study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Gaussian Function Model for Task-Specific Evaluation in Medical Imaging: A Theoretical Investigation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of low-contrast detectability between uniform and anatomically realistic phantoms-influences on CT image quality assessment.European radiology · 2022Article
- Assessment of task-based image quality for abdominal CT protocols linked with national diagnostic reference levels.European radiology · 2022Article
- Variability in image quality and radiation dose within and across 97 medical facilities.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Rapid measurement of the low contrast detectability of CT scanners.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Effect of obesity on ability to lower exposure for detection of low-attenuation liver lesions.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Article
- Optimization of radiation dose for CT detection of lytic and sclerotic bone lesions: a phantom study.European radiology · 2020Article
- Reconstruction of PET Images Using Cross-Entropy and Field of Experts.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Task-Based Model Observer Assessment of A Partial Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Thoracic Oncologic Multidetector CT.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated the variability in diagnostic information inherent in computed tomography (CT) images acquired at 68 different CT units, with the selected acquisition protocols aiming to answer the same clinical question.
methodsAn anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with two optional rings was scanned on 68 CT systems from 62 centres using the local clinical acquisition parameters of the portal venous phase for the detection of focal liver lesions. Low-contrast detectability (LCD) was assessed objectively with channelised Hotelling observer (CHO) using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) paradigm. For each lesion size, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and considered as a figure of merit. The volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI
resultsThe median CTDI
conclusionsOur study used a model observer to highlight the difference in image quality levels when dealing with the same clinical question. This difference was important and increased with growing phantom size, which generated large variations in patient exposure. In the end, a standardisation initiative may be launched to ensure comparable diagnostic information for well-defined clinical questions. The image quality requirements, related to the clinical question to be answered, should be the starting point of patient dose optimisation. KEY POINTS: • Model observers enable to assess image quality objectively based on clinical tasks. • Objective image quality assessment should always include several patient sizes. • Clinical diagnostic image quality should be the starting point for patient dose optimisation. • Dose optimisation by applying DRLs only is insufficient for ensuring clinical requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.