Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018
Feasibility of dynamic stress
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CZT-SPECT in coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Feasibility of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with CZT SPECT and SPECT/CT: Current Limitations and Recommendations for Future Improvements.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve quantification with single photon emission computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Atherosclerotic Plaque Volume as A Predictor of Myocardial Blood Flow Impairment in Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation for the detection of angiographic stenoses with cardiac-dedicated CZT SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- All that glisters is not gold: the elusive difference between statistics and pathophysiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Measuring myocardial blood flow using dynamic myocardial perfusion SPECT: artifacts and pitfalls.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Associations of cardiovascular and diabetes-related risk factors with myocardial perfusion reserve assessed byThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: A comparison of dynamic SPECT coronary flow reserve with intracoronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR).Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: CZT SPECT Study.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2022Article
- KSNM60 in Cardiology: Regrowth After a Long Pause.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Absolute myocardial blood flows derived by dynamic CZT scan vs invasive fractional flow reserve: Correlation and accuracy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- The potential of regional myocardial blood flow measurement with SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Myocardial blood flow assessment with SPECT systems: The renovation continues.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Cardiovascular Imaging Techniques to Assess Microvascular Dysfunction.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020Review
- Debates over NICE Guideline Update: What Are the Roles of Nuclear Cardiology in the Initial Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Review
- Quantification of myocardial blood flow with dynamic SPECT acquisitions: ready for prime time?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the feasibility of dynamic stress
methodsSubjects with stable known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who had undergone or were scheduled to undergo fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement were prospectively enrolled. Dynamic stress
resultsA total of 34 subjects were enrolled (25 men and 9 women; mean age 60.4 years). FFR was measured in 65 coronary arteries with intermediate lesions. The average global MPR was 2.58 ± 1.03. Global MPR was associated with the extent of CAD (P = 0.028) and global summed stress score (r = -0.60, P < 0.001). Regional MPR showed a significant correlation with diameter stenosis (r = -0.57, P < 0.001), minimum lumen diameter (r = 0.50, P < 0.001), summed stress score (r = -0.52, P < 0.001) and FFR (r = 0.52, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MPR for the diagnosis of functionally significant stenosis (FFR ≤0.8) was 0.79 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of regional MPR were 67% and 83%, respectively, using a cut-off value of 2.0.
conclusionDynamic stress
Indexed as
Identifiers
29858614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.