Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858590›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2018

Serum chromogranin-A-based prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Karthik V Giridhar, Cristobal Sanhueza, David W Hillman, Hassan Alkhateeb, Rachel Carlson, Winston Tan, Brian A Costello, Fernando Quevedo, Lance Pagliaro, Manish Kohli

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evaluation of CisBio ELISA for Chromogranin A Measurement.The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karthik V GiridharDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-9197
Cristobal SanhuezaDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David W HillmanDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hassan AlkhateebDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rachel CarlsonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Winston TanDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Brian A CostelloDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Fernando QuevedoDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lance PagliaroDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Manish KohliDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. kohli.manish@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Cell free nucleic acid-based biomarkers in advanced prostate cancerR01CA212097 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI KOHLI, MANISH, WANG, LIANG · 2017 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prognostic value of serum chromogranin-A (CGA) in a two-cohort study of men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to compare with circulating tumor cells (CTCs)-based prognosis. PATIENTS AND

methodsA two-cohort-based evaluation for serum CGA for prognostication in CRPC stage was performed using a screening cohort of 256 men with mCRPC and an independent validation cohort of 92 men with mCRPC. In both cohorts, men receiving proton pump inhibitors and those with non-castrate levels of testosterone (>50 ng/dl) were excluded. Serum CGA was measured in a homogeneous automated immunofluorescent assay using time-resolved amplified cryptate emission. In the validation cohort, CTC enumeration was also performed using the FDA-cleared CELLSEARCH® CTC test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for prognostic association of serum CGA and CTC counts with overall survival.

resultsIn the screening cohort, 200 men were eligible for analysis. The median serum CGA was 100.3 ng/mL (interquartile range: 67-161.3) and 34/200 were above the reference range. In the subset of men with Gleason scores ≥ 8, elevated CGA was associated with shorter overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.19, p = 0.017]. In the validation cohort for 71 men eligible for analysis, the median serum CGA was 90 ng/mL (interquartile range: 55-156) and 31/71 patients had an elevated CGA. 51% of patients had a Gleason score ≥ 8 and 66/71 patients had CTCs enumerated with 26/66 with a CTC count ≥ 5 per 7.5 ml blood sample (unfavorable). Both elevated serum CGA (HR: 1.91, p = 0.043) and unfavorable CTC counts (HR: 2.97, p = 0.0012) were adversely associated with overall survival and patients with ≥ 5 CTCs and elevated serum CGA had the shortest overall survival (HR: 3.76, p = 0.008).

conclusionElevated serum CGA was negatively associated with OS in men with mCRPC. Serum CGA represents a prognostic biomarker that may complement CTC enumeration.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingAgedBiomarkers, TumorCell CountChromogranin ADisease ProgressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansKallikreinsKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantBiomarkers, TumorCHGA protein, humanChromogranin AKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29858590
PMCPMC6126956
OpenAlexW2807335122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.