Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858526›Full record

ReviewHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018

Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution: Practical recommendations for researchers.

Lisa D Hawke, Jacqueline Relihan, Joshua Miller, Emma McCann, Jessica Rong, Karleigh Darnay, Samantha Docherty, Gloria Chaim, Joanna L Henderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Youth engagement in mental health research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. 'It reshaped how I will do research': A qualitative exploration of team members' experiences with youth and family engagement in a randomized controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Building the Capacity of Adolescents as Researchers: The Co-Creation of the Health Hive Online Course.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. 'Co-Production Is Caring': Young People's Reflections on Responsible and Dialogic Co-Production in Youth Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa D HawkeCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1108-9453
Jacqueline RelihanCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joshua MillerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Emma McCannCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jessica RongCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Karleigh DarnayCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Samantha DochertyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gloria ChaimCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Joanna L HendersonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEngaging youth as partners in academic research projects offers many benefits for the youth and the research team. However, it is not always clear to researchers how to engage youth effectively to optimize the experience and maximize the impact.

objectiveThis article provides practical recommendations to help researchers engage youth in meaningful ways in academic research, from initial planning to project completion. These general recommendations can be applied to all types of research methodologies, from community action-based research to highly technical designs.

resultsYouth can and do provide valuable input into academic research projects when their contributions are authentically valued, their roles are clearly defined, communication is clear, and their needs are taken into account. Researchers should be aware of the risk of tokenizing the youth they engage and work proactively to take their feedback into account in a genuine way. Some adaptations to regular research procedures are recommended to improve the success of the youth engagement initiative.

conclusionsBy following these guidelines, academic researchers can make youth engagement a key tenet of their youth-oriented research initiatives, increasing the feasibility, youth-friendliness and ecological validity of their work and ultimately improve the value and impact of the results their research produces.

Indexed as

Research DesignResearch PersonnelAdolescentCommunicationCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorHumansMental HealthProgram Developmentmental healthpatient-centred researchresearch methodologyyouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID29858526
PMCPMC6250868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.