Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858272›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2018

Microtubules and Microtubule-Associated Proteins.

Holly V Goodson, Erin M Jonasson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 312 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
312citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

312 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Capillary bundling of microtubules by condensates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

252 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Holly V GoodsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556.
Erin M JonassonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubules act as "railways" for motor-driven intracellular transport, interact with accessory proteins to assemble into larger structures such as the mitotic spindle, and provide an organizational framework to the rest of the cell. Key to these functions is the fact that microtubules are "dynamic." As with actin, the polymer dynamics are driven by nucleotide hydrolysis and influenced by a host of specialized regulatory proteins, including microtubule-associated proteins. However, microtubule turnover involves a surprising behavior-termed dynamic instability-in which individual polymers switch stochastically between growth and depolymerization. Dynamic instability allows microtubules to explore intracellular space and remodel in response to intracellular and extracellular cues. Here, we review how such instability is central to the assembly of many microtubule-based structures and to the robust functioning of the microtubule cytoskeleton.

Indexed as

AnimalsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMitosisModels, MolecularProtein ConformationMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29858272
PMCPMC5983186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.