Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858068›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2018

A Deep Learning Framework for Robust and Accurate Prediction of ncRNA-Protein Interactions Using Evolutionary Information.

Hai-Cheng Yi, Zhu-Hong You, De-Shuang Huang, Xiao Li, Tong-Hai Jiang, Li-Ping Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Bioinformatics Approaches in Noncoding RNAs Research.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Targeting ST8SIA6-AS1 counteracts KRASExperimental hematology & oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Cheng YiXinjiang Technical Institutes of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Zhu-Hong YouXinjiang Technical Institutes of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China. Electronic address: zhuhongyou@ms.xjb.ac.cn.
De-Shuang HuangInstitute of Machine Learning and Systems Biology, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: dshuang@tongji.edu.cn.
Xiao LiXinjiang Technical Institutes of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China.
Tong-Hai JiangXinjiang Technical Institutes of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China.
Li-Ping LiXinjiang Technical Institutes of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Urumqi 830011, China.
Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions between non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and proteins play an important role in many biological processes, and their biological functions are primarily achieved by binding with a variety of proteins. High-throughput biological techniques are used to identify protein molecules bound with specific ncRNA, but they are usually expensive and time consuming. Deep learning provides a powerful solution to computationally predict RNA-protein interactions. In this work, we propose the RPI-SAN model by using the deep-learning stacked auto-encoder network to mine the hidden high-level features from RNA and protein sequences and feed them into a random forest (RF) model to predict ncRNA binding proteins. Stacked assembling is further used to improve the accuracy of the proposed method. Four benchmark datasets, including RPI2241, RPI488, RPI1807, and NPInter v2.0, were employed for the unbiased evaluation of five established prediction tools: RPI-Pred, IPMiner, RPISeq-RF, lncPro, and RPI-SAN. The experimental results show that our RPI-SAN model achieves much better performance than other methods, with accuracies of 90.77%, 89.7%, 96.1%, and 99.33%, respectively. It is anticipated that RPI-SAN can be used as an effective computational tool for future biomedical researches and can accurately predict the potential ncRNA-protein interacted pairs, which provides reliable guidance for biological research.

Indexed as

deep learningnon-coding RNAPSSMRNA-protein interactionsstacked auto-encoderZernike moment

Identifiers

PMID29858068
PMCPMC5992449
OpenAlexW2793344725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.