Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29858048›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2018

Efficient Delivery and Nuclear Uptake Is Not Sufficient to Detect Gene Editing in CD34+ Cells Directed by a Ribonucleoprotein Complex.

Shirin R Modarai, Dula Man, Pawel Bialk, Natalia Rivera-Torres, Kevin Bloh, Eric B Kmiec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CRISPR/Cas9 Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Knock-In Approach to Insert the GFPMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shirin R ModaraiGene Editing Institute, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Dula ManGene Editing Institute, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Pawel BialkGene Editing Institute, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE 19713, USA.
Natalia Rivera-TorresDepartment of Medical Sciences University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Kevin BlohNemours Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA.
Eric B KmiecGene Editing Institute, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, DE 19713, USA. Electronic address: eric.b.kmiec@christianacare.org.
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USChristiana Care Health System · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Predictive Modeling & Optimal Control Framework for Model-Based Epidemic Response in DelawareP20GM103446 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI MELINDA K DUNCAN · 2012 to 2026
$67.2M
The eye as a window into sickle cell disease morbidityP20GM109021 · NIGMS · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI HILDENBRAND, AIMEE K · 2014 to 2025
$20.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103446NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD34+ cells are prime targets for therapeutic strategies for gene editing, because modified progenitor cells have the capacity to differentiate through an erythropoietic lineage. Although experimental advances have been reported, the associated experimental protocols have largely been less than clear or robust. As such, we evaluated the relationships among cellular delivery; nuclear uptake, often viewed as the benchmark metric of successful gene editing; and single base repair. We took a combinatorial approach using single-stranded oligonucleotide and a CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein to convert wild-type HBB into the sickle cell genotype by evaluating conditions for two common delivery strategies of gene editing tools into CD34+ cells. Confocal microscopy data show that the CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein tends to accumulate at the outer membrane of the CD34+ cell nucleus when the Neon Transfection System is employed, while the ribonucleoproteins do pass into the cell nucleus when nucleofection is used. Despite the high efficiency of cellular transformation, and the traditional view of success in efficient nuclear uptake, neither delivery methodology enabled gene editing activity. Our results indicate that more stringent criteria must be established to facilitate the clinical translation and scientific robustness of gene editing for sickle cell disease.

Indexed as

CD34+ cellsCRISPR/Cas9gene editingnuclear uptakeribonucleoprotein

Identifiers

PMID29858048
PMCPMC5992347
OpenAlexW2788243483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.