ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Broadband Elicitor Duration on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and a Psychoacoustic Measure of Gain Reduction.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- The effects of broadband elicitor duration on a psychoacoustic measure of cochlear gain reduction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- The effect of broadband elicitor laterality on psychoacoustic gain reduction across signal frequency.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- The relationship between ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction and speech-in-noise recognition at positive and negative signal-to-noise ratios.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Behavioral Measures of Cochlear Gain Reduction Depend on Precursor Frequency, Bandwidth, and Level.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forward masking experiments at 4 kHz have demonstrated that preceding sound can elicit changes in masking patterns consistent with a change in cochlear gain. However, the acoustic environment is filled with complex sounds, often dominated by lower frequencies, and ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction at frequencies below 4 kHz is largely unstudied in the forward masking literature. In this experiment, the magnitude of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction was explored at 1, 2, and 4 kHz using forward masking techniques in an effort to evaluate a range of frequencies in listeners with normal hearing. Gain reduction estimates were not significantly different at 2 and 4 kHz using two forward masking measurements. Although the frequency was a significant factor in the analysis, post hoc testing supported the interpretation that gain reduction estimates measured without a masker were not significantly different at 1, 2, and 4 kHz. A second experiment provided evidence that forward masking in this paradigm at 1 kHz cannot be explained by excitation alone. This study provides evidence of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction in humans at frequencies below the 4 kHz region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.