Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856884›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Antinutritional factors in pearl millet grains: Phytate and goitrogens content variability and molecular characterization of genes involved in their pathways.

Eleonora Boncompagni, Gregorio Orozco-Arroyo, Eleonora Cominelli, Prakash Irappa Gangashetty, Stefania Grando, Theophilus Tenutse Kwaku Zu, Maria Gloria Daminati, Erik Nielsen, Francesca Sparvoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Phytic Acid and Transporters: What Can We Learn fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleonora BoncompagniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Gregorio Orozco-ArroyoInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, CNR, Milan, Italy.
Eleonora CominelliInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, CNR, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-3323
Prakash Irappa GangashettyICRISAT Sahelian Center, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Niamey, Niger.
Stefania GrandoICRISAT Patancheru, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Theophilus Tenutse Kwaku ZuDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Maria Gloria DaminatiInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, CNR, Milan, Italy.
Erik NielsenDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-6566
Francesca SparvoliInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, CNR, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-7548
Deleted InstitutionUniversity of Pavia · ITInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] is an important "orphan" cereal and the most widely grown of all the millet species worldwide. It is also the sixth most important cereal in the world after wheat, rice, maize, barley, and sorghum, being largely grown and used in West Africa as well as in India and Pakistan. The present study was carried out in the frame of a program designed to increase benefits and reduce potential health problems deriving from the consumption of pearl millet. The specific goal was to provide a database of information on the variability existing in pearl millet germplasm as to the amounts of phytate, the most relevant antinutrient compound, and the goitrogenic compounds C-glycosylflavones (C-GFs) accumulated in the grain.Results we obtained clearly show that, as indicated by the range in values, a substantial variability subsists across the investigated pearl millet inbred lines as regards the grain level of phytic acid phosphate, while the amount of C-GFs shows a very high variation. Suitable potential parents to be used in breeding programs can be therefore chosen from the surveyed material in order to create new germplasm with increased nutritional quality and food safety. Moreover, we report novel molecular data showing which genes are more relevant for phytic acid biosynthesis in the seeds as well as a preliminary analysis of a pearl millet orthologous gene for C-GFs biosynthesis. These results open the way to dissect the genetic determinants controlling key seed nutritional phenotypes and to the characterization of their impact on grain nutritional value in pearl millet.

Indexed as

Antithyroid AgentsPennisetumPhytic AcidCenchrusCloning, MolecularEdible GrainFood SafetyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic VariationMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPhenotypePlant BreedingAntithyroid AgentsPhytic Acid

Identifiers

PMID29856884
PMCPMC5983567
OpenAlexW2805366847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.