ArticlePloS one2018
Resistance to Nilaparvata lugens in rice lines introgressed with the resistance genes Bph14 and Bph15 and related resistance types.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of candidate genes for Nilaparvata lugens (stål) resistance through genomic dissection from diverse Indigenous rice genotypes.Botanical studies · 2025Article
- Artificial miRNAs and target-mimics as potential tools for crop improvement.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Review
- Integrative Omics Strategies for Understanding and Combating Brown Planthopper Virulence in Rice Production: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Virulence Adaptation by Rice Planthoppers and Leafhoppers to Resistance Genes and Loci: A Review.Insects · 2024Review
- Development of pyramided lines carrying brown planthopper resistance genes in the genetic background of Indica Group rice (Breeding science · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Molecular Mechanism and Breeding Utilization of Brown Planthopper Resistance Genes in Rice: An Integrated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Phenotyping for Rice Resistance and Tolerance to Planthoppers.Insects · 2021Article
- RNA-Sequencing Reveals Differentially Expressed Rice Genes Functionally Associated with Defense against BPH and WBPH in RILs Derived from a Cross between RP2068 and TN1.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of two Nilaparvata lugens populations to the Mudgo rice containing Bph1.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Unanticipated benefits and potential ecological costs associated with pyramiding leafhopper resistance loci in rice.Crop protection (Guildford, Surrey) · 2019Article
- Differential Responses ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop resistance is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly strategy for pest management. The brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens) is a devastating rice insect pest due to its ability to rapidly overcome plant resistance and the lack of sufficient resistance resources. BR4831 (a rice breeding line derived from the pyramiding of two BPH resistance genes, Bph14 and Bph15, into the elite rice variety Huang-Hua-Zhan, HHZ) and two single-gene introgression lines (HF106, carrying Bph14, and C602, carrying Bph15, in the elite rice cultivar 9311) were evaluated for their resistance to BPH using a standard seed box screening test coupled with field tests. The related resistance types were determined using laboratory assays. The seed box test and laboratory biological assays showed that BR4831 exhibited strong antibiotic resistance, and the behavioral assay showed that this line also exhibited strong antixenotic resistance, while both HF106 and C602 exhibited only weak antibiosis and no antixenotic resistance. Field tests showed significantly improved resistance in BR4831 compared to that of its recipient parent HHZ and slightly increased resistance in HF106 and C602 in comparison with their recipient parent 9311. These results demonstrate that the rice line BR4831, with pyramided resistance genes, exhibits higher resistance than the monogenic lines HF106 and C602 and highlight the benefits of combining the seed box seedling test, field tests and laboratory assays to thoroughly analyze plant resistance types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.