Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856837›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Eltrombopag versus romiplostim in treatment of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review incorporating an indirect-comparison meta-analysis.

Jiaxing Zhang, Yi Liang, Yuan Ai, Xiaosi Li, Juan Xie, Youping Li, Wenyi Zheng, Rui He

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sequential Use of Romiplostim after Eltrombopag for Refractory Thrombocytopenia in Hydrocarbon-Induced Myelodysplasia.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiaxing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0178-7007
Yi LiangHealth Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States.
Yuan AiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaosi LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu, China.
Juan XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Youping LiChinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenyi ZhengExperimental Cancer Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
Rui HeExperimental Cancer Medicine, Clinical Research Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden.
Sichuan University · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEAustin College · USGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNTibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn absence of direct comparison randomized controlled trials (RCTs), indirect comparison was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in treatment of adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database from their earliest records to May 2017. RCTs comparing the TPO-RAs with placebo in adult ITP were included. Primary outcomes were the overall response rate. Secondary outcomes included safety, durable response, overall or clinically significant bleeding, and the proportion of patients receiving rescue medication.

resultsNine randomized placebo-controlled trials (786 participants) were included in this systematic review. Overall response [Risk Ratio(RR) = 0.59, 95%Confidence Interval(CI): 0.24-1.45], the incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.79-1.21), durable response (RR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.08-2.81), the incidence of overall bleeding (RR = 1.15, 95%CI: 0.52-2.57) and clinically significant bleeding (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.37-3.24), and the proportion of patients receiving rescue treatment (RR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.47-1.90) were similar between eltrombopag and romiplostim.

conclusionsEltrombopag and romiplostim might be equivalent in efficacy and safety for adult ITP, however, physicians should still take into account drug cost and comorbidities of the specific patient while making decisions on the treatment of ITP with TPO-RAs. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017068661).

Indexed as

AdultBenzoatesBlood PlateletsHemorrhageHumansHydrazinesPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicPyrazolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, FcRecombinant Fusion ProteinsThrombopoietinTreatment OutcomeBenzoateseltrombopagHydrazinesPyrazolesReceptors, FcRecombinant Fusion ProteinsromiplostimThrombopoietin

Identifiers

PMID29856837
PMCPMC5983520
OpenAlexW2806221346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.