Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856832›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Using financial incentives to promote physical activity in American Indian adolescents: A randomized controlled trial.

Kevin R Short, Jennifer Q Chadwick, Tamela K Cannady, Dannielle E Branam, David F Wharton, Mary A Tullier, David M Thompson, Kenneth C Copeland

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01848353 (Incentivizing Behavior), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01848353 nacompletednot on this map

Incentivizing Behavior: Promoting More Physical Activity in American Indian Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OklahomaRan2013 to 2017Enrolled142ConditionsInsulin Resistance, Obesity, Sedentary LifestyleArmsExercise training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Promoting physical activity: the contribution of regulatory fit.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Community Engagement: Why Oklahoma? Why Now?The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin R ShortDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-9587
Jennifer Q ChadwickDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
Tamela K CannadyChoctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Durant, OK, United States of America.
Dannielle E BranamChoctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Durant, OK, United States of America.
David F WhartonChoctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Durant, OK, United States of America.
Mary A TullierChoctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Durant, OK, United States of America.
David M ThompsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
Kenneth C CopelandDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

TRAINING COREP20MD000528 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI STEPHENS, LANCER · 2003 to 2016
$17.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

American Indians (AI) have high prevalence of diabetes in youth and may benefit from increasing physical activity as a strategy to improve metabolic health. We tested whether financial incentives would elicit greater frequency and/or duration of exercise in AI youth at high risk for developing diabetes. Overweight/obese AI boys and girls, 11-20 years old, were instructed to exercise on 3 days/week for 48 weeks at a tribal wellness center. The program was divided into three, 16-week-long phases to test different financial incentive strategies. Within each phase participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups that received different payments for exercise. Phase 1 was designed to test whether the size of the incentive would affect exercise frequency. In Phase 1, the number of exercise sessions did not differ between the group receiving a modest fixed-value payment per exercise session and the group receiving enhanced incentives to exercise more frequently (26 ± 3 versus 28 ± 2 sessions, respectively, p = 0.568). In Phase 2, the provision of an enhanced financial incentive to increase exercise duration resulted longer sessions, as the incentivized and standard payment groups exercised 38 ± 2 versus 29 ± 1 minutes per session (p = 0.002), respectively. In Phase 3, the effect of reducing the incentives on maintenance of exercise behaviors was inconclusive due to high participant withdrawal. Aerobic fitness increased 10% during Phase 1 but was unchanged thereafter. Insulin sensitivity and body composition were unchanged during the study. In conclusion, enhanced financial incentives increased the duration of exercise sessions, but had minimal effects on exercise participation. These results indicate that financial incentives hold promise in motivating previously sedentary, overweight/obese adolescents to exercise longer, but motivating them to sustain an exercise program remains the major challenge.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01848353.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyFinancial SupportIndians, North AmericanRewardAdolescentAdultChildExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMotivationObesityOverweightYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29856832
PMCPMC5983431
OpenAlexW2806047125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.