Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy in a Portuguese sample.

Andreia Queirós, Eugénia Fernandes, Renate Reniers, Adriana Sampaio, Joana Coutinho, Ana Seara-Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreia QueirósNeuropsychophysiology Lab, CIPsi, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7340-889X
Eugénia FernandesNeuropsychophysiology Lab, CIPsi, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Renate ReniersInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Adriana SampaioNeuropsychophysiology Lab, CIPsi, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Joana CoutinhoNeuropsychophysiology Lab, CIPsi, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Ana Seara-CardosoNeuropsychophysiology Lab, CIPsi, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-9124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathy is an important concept in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Despite the controversy around its definition, most researchers would agree that empathy is a multidimensional phenomenon which involves a vicarious experience of another person's affective state and an understanding of another person's affective experience. Self-report measures of empathy constitute an important tool for both research and clinical practice. The main goal of this study was to adapt and study the psychometric properties of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE), a worldwide used measure of empathy, in a Portuguese community sample (N = 562). Confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structure of the original QCAE. Results show that the Portuguese version of the QCAE has sound psychometric properties, with good structural validity and internal consistency for both scales (i.e., affective and cognitive) and respective subscales of the instrument (i.e., Emotion Contagion, Proximal Responsivity, Peripheral Responsivity, Perspective Taking and Online Simulation). We tested both a five correlated factor structure (Model 1) and a second-order model that postulates the affective and cognitive dimensions (Model 2). Our results show that while both models present acceptable goodness of fit indices, Model 1 performs slightly better. In conclusion, the Portuguese version of the QCAE may prove a useful tool for future cross-cultural assessments of empathy in both research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdolescentAdultCognitionEmotionsEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29856825
PMCPMC5983521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.