Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856809›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Critically ill elderly patients (≥ 90 years): Clinical characteristics, outcome and financial implications.

Pierrick Le Borgne, Quentin Maestraggi, Sophie Couraud, François Lefebvre, Jean-Etienne Herbrecht, Alexandra Boivin, Baptiste Michard, Vincent Castelain, Georges Kaltenbach, Pascal Bilbault and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Natural enemy or friend? Pneumonia in the very elderly critically ill patient.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Community-acquired pneumonia in critically ill very old patients: a growing problem.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pierrick Le BorgneEmergency Department, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-6439
Quentin MaestraggiMedical Intensive Care Unit and UMR 1121, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Sophie CouraudEmergency Department, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
François LefebvreDepartment of Public Health, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Etienne HerbrechtMedical Intensive Care Unit and UMR 1121, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Alexandra BoivinMedical Intensive Care Unit and UMR 1121, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Baptiste MichardMedical Intensive Care Unit and UMR 1121, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Vincent CastelainMedical Intensive Care Unit and UMR 1121, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Georges KaltenbachDepartment of Geriatrics, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Pascal BilbaultEmergency Department, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Francis SchneiderMedical Intensive Care Unit and UMR 1121, Hautepierre Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients aged over 90 are being admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with increasing frequency. The appropriateness of such decisions still remains controversial due to questionable outcome, limited resources and costs. Our objective was to determine the clinical characteristics and outcome in elderly patients (≥ 90 years) admitted in a medical ICU, with an additional focus on medico-economic implications.

methodsWe reviewed the charts of all patients (≥ 90 years) admitted to our ICU. We compared them with all other ICU patients (< 90 years), sought to identify ICU mortality predictors and also performed a long-term survival follow-up.

resultsIn the study group of 317 stays: median age was 92 years (IQR: 91-94 years); most patients were female (71.3%.). Acute respiratory failure (52.4%) was the main admission diagnosis; mean SAPS II was 55.6±21.3; half the stays (49.2%) required mechanical ventilation (duration: 7.2±8.8 days); withholding and withdrawing decisions were made for 33.4% of all stays. ICU and hospital mortality rates were 35.7% and 42.6% respectively. Mechanical ventilation (OR = 4.83, CI95%: 1.59-15.82) was an independent predictor of ICU mortality whereas age was not (OR = 0.88, CI95%: 0.72-1.08). Social security reimbursement was significantly lower in the study group compared with all other ICU stays, both per stay (13,160 vs 22,092 Euros, p< 0.01) and per day of stay (p = 0.03).

conclusionAmong critically ill elderly patients (≥ 90 years), chronological age was not an independent factor of ICU mortality. ICU care-related costs in this population should not be considered as a limiting factor for ICU admission.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessFrail ElderlyAged, 80 and overFemaleFranceHealth Care CostsHealth ResourcesHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMalePrognosisSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29856809
PMCPMC5983531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.