ArticlePloS one2018
Enhancing the usability of low-cost eye trackers for rehabilitation applications.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye tracking is one of the most widely used technique for assessment, screening and human-machine interaction related applications. There are certain issues which limit the usage of eye trackers in practical scenarios, viz., i) need to perform multiple calibrations and ii) presence of inherent noise in the recorded data. To address these issues, we have proposed a protocol for one-time calibration against the "regular" or the "multiple" calibration phases. It is seen that though it is always desirable to perform multiple calibration, the one-time calibration also produces comparable results and might be better for individuals who are not able to perform multiple calibrations. In that case, "One-time calibration" can also be done by a participant and the calibration results are used for the rest of the participants, provided the chin rest and the eye tracker positions are unaltered. The second major issue is the presence of the inherent noise in the raw gaze data, leading to systematic and variable errors. We have proposed a signal processing chain to remove these two types of errors. Two different psychological stimuli-based tasks, namely, recall-recognition test and number gazing task are used as a case study for the same. It is seen that the proposed approach gives satisfactory results even with one-time calibration. The study is also extended to test the effect of long duration task on the performance of the proposed algorithm and the results confirm that the proposed methods work well in such scenarios too.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.