Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856795›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Reduced mortality and subsequent fracture risk associated with oral bisphosphonate recommendation in a fracture liaison service setting: A prospective cohort study.

Tineke A C M van Geel, Dana Bliuc, Piet P M Geusens, Jacqueline R Center, Geert-Jan Dinant, Thach Tran, Joop P W van den Bergh, Alastair R McLellan, John A Eisman

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Adherence to secondary fracture prevention is associated with reduced risk of subsequent fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact of a fracture liaison service with in-hospital anti-osteoporosis treatment on subsequent hip fracture and mortality rates-a single-center retrospective study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Approach to the Patient With Bone Fracture: Making the First Fracture the Last.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Risk of Contralateral Hip Fracture Following Initial Hip Fracture Among Geriatric Fragility Fracture Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Osteoporosis Medications Prevent Subsequent Fracture in Frail Older Adults.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tineke A C M van GeelDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2022-6552
Dana BliucOsteoporosis & Bone Biology Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Piet P M GeusensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Subdivision of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline R CenterOsteoporosis & Bone Biology Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Geert-Jan DinantDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thach TranOsteoporosis & Bone Biology Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Joop P W van den BerghBiomedical Research Institute, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Alastair R McLellanWestern Infirmary, Gardiner Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
John A EismanDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOsteoporotic fragility fractures, that are common in men and women, signal increased risk of future fractures and of premature mortality. Less than one-third of postmenopausal women and fewer men are prescribed active treatments to reduce fracture risk. Therefore, in this study the association of oral bisphosphonate recommendation with subsequent fracture and mortality over eight years in a fracture liaison service setting was analysed. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective cohort study, 5011 men and women aged >50 years, who sustained a clinical fracture, accepted the invitation to attend the fracture liaison service of the West Glasgow health service between 1999 and 2007. These patients were fully assessed and all were recommended calcium and vitamin D. Based on pre-defined fracture risk criteria, 2534 (50.7%) patients were additionally also recommended oral bisphosphonates. Mortality and subsequent fracture risk were the pre-defined outcomes analysed using Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsThose recommended bisphosphonates were more often female (82.9 vs. 72.4%), were older (73.4 vs. 64.4 years), had lower bone mineral density T-score (-3.1 vs. -1.5) and more had sustained hip fractures (21.7 vs. 6.2%; p < 0.001). After adjustments, patients recommended bisphosphonates had lower subsequent fracture risk (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.73) and lower mortality risk (HR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.64-0.97).

conclusionOf the patients, who are fully assessed after a fracture at the fracture liaison service, those with higher fracture risk and a recommendation for bisphosphonates had worse baseline characteristics. However, after adjusting for these differences, those recommended bisphosphonate treatment had a substantially lower risk for subsequent fragility fracture and lower risk for mortality. These community-based data indicate the adverse public health outcomes and mortality impacts of the current low treatment levels post fracture could be improved by bisphosphonate recommendation for both subsequent fracture and mortality.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedCohort StudiesDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesProspective StudiesRiskDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID29856795
PMCPMC5983426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.