Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856770›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Exploring the links between water, sanitation and hygiene and disability; Results from a case-control study in Guatemala.

Hannah Kuper, Islay Mactaggart, Sian White, Carlos Dionicio, Rafael Cañas, Jonathan Naber, Sarah Polack, Adam Biran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-0023
Islay MactaggartInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sian WhiteDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Carlos DionicioNational Council on Disability, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Rafael CañasNational Council on Disability, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Jonathan NaberNational Council on Disability, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Sarah PolackInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Adam BiranDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) access and appropriateness of people with disabilities compared to those without, in Guatemala.

methodsA case-control study was conducted, nested within a national survey. The study included 707 people with disabilities, and 465 age- and sex-matched controls without disabilities. Participants reported on WASH access at the household and individual level. A sub-set of 121 cases and 104 controls completed a newly designed, in-depth WASH questionnaire.

resultsHouseholds including people with disabilities were more likely to use an improved sanitation facility compared to control households (age-sex-adjusted OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), but otherwise there were no differences in WASH access at the household level. At the individual level, people with disabilities reported greater difficulties in relation to sanitation (mean score 26.2, SD 26.5) and hygiene access and quality (mean 30.7, SD 24.2) compared to those without disabilities (15.5, 21.7, p<0.001; 22.4, 19.1, p<0.01). There were no differences in different aspects of water collection between people with and without disabilities in this context where over 85% of participants had water piped into their dwelling. Among people with disabilities, older adults were more likely to experience difficulties in hygiene and sanitation than younger people with disabilities.

conclusionsPeople with disabilities in Guatemala experience greater difficulties in accessing sanitation facilities and practicing hygienic behaviours than their peers without disabilities. More data collection is needed using detailed tools to detect these differences, highlight which interventions are needed, and to allow assessment of their effectiveness.

Indexed as

Water SupplyAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGuatemalaHand DisinfectionHumansHygieneMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesRural PopulationSanitationWater

Identifiers

PMID29856770
PMCPMC5983415
OpenAlexW2805643514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.